Comparison Overview

Force10 Networks

VS

Giza

Force10 Networks

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.force10networks.com

Force10 Networks develops high-performance data center solutions powered by the industry’s most innovative line of open, standards-based, networking hardware and software. The company’s Open Cloud Networking framework grants Web 2.0/portal operators, cloud and hosting providers, enterprise and special-purpose data center customers new levels of flexibility, performance, scale and automation—fundamentally changing the economics of data center networking. Force10 Networks operates globally, providing 24x7 service and support to its customer base in more than 60 countries worldwide. For more information, visit www.force10networks.com.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 266
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Giza

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849
http://www.giza.dk

Giza is a team of professionals, based in the UK and Denmark, all working to world standards of quality. We’re good at what we do, with the track record to prove it. Our customers are all around the globe. How we work... We love engaging with people of different talents who are deeply involved and strongly committed to new ideas, whatever their backgrounds. We also like to work to one very clear principle – combining world-class quality with solid reliability to bring IT costs down to a manageable level. We’ve plenty of other cost-savers to recommend too. Just contact us and we’ll get them working for you. 1 visible recommendation for this posit

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 201
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/force10-networks.jpeg
Force10 Networks
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Force10 Networks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Giza
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Force10 Networks in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Giza in 2025.

Incident History — Force10 Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Force10 Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Giza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Giza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/force10-networks.jpeg
Force10 Networks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giza.jpeg
Giza
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Force10 Networks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Giza company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Giza company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Force10 Networks company.

In the current year, Giza company and Force10 Networks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Giza company nor Force10 Networks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Giza company nor Force10 Networks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Giza company nor Force10 Networks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Force10 Networks company nor Giza company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Giza holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Force10 Networks company nor Giza company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Force10 Networks company employs more people globally than Giza company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Giza holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Giza holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Giza holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Giza holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Giza holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Force10 Networks nor Giza holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References