Comparison Overview

Forbes India

VS

Harvard Law Review

Forbes India

undefined, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400013, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://forbesindia.com/

Forbes India, a Network18 venture in partnership with Forbes Media LLC, is India’s leading business magazine that helps readers understand the phenomenon behind news, connect the dots and get cutting-edge perspectives. Its senior editorial team has years of experience and produces a compelling package of short newsy features, in-depth articles and lifestyle stories every two weeks. Forbes India has been one of India's most sought-after and credible business magazines, since its launch on May 21, 2009. To subscribe to Forbes India, go to: http://forbesindia.com/subscription/

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Harvard Law Review

1511 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harvardlawreview.org

The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbes-india.jpeg
Forbes India
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Forbes India
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Harvard Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forbes India in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Forbes India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forbes India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Harvard Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harvard Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/forbes-india.jpeg
Forbes India
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Forbes India company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harvard Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Harvard Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Forbes India company.

In the current year, Harvard Law Review company and Forbes India company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Forbes India company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Forbes India company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Forbes India company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Forbes India company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Forbes India nor Harvard Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Forbes India company nor Harvard Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Forbes India company employs more people globally than Harvard Law Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Forbes India nor Harvard Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Forbes India nor Harvard Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Forbes India nor Harvard Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Forbes India nor Harvard Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Forbes India nor Harvard Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Forbes India nor Harvard Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References