Comparison Overview

Foosaner Art Museum

VS

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum

Foosaner Art Museum

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://foosanerartmuseum.org

The Foosaner Art Museum is located along the Indian River in the Eau Gallie Arts District (EGAD). We are a gathering place, a catalyst for change, and a center of creativity. The Foosaner collects, displays, and interprets all aspects of the visual arts in ways that relate to the past, the present, and to … Continue reading "Home"

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum

3696 Main Street, Riverside, CA, 92501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.MissionInnMuseum.org

The Mission Inn Foundation preserves, interprets, and promotes the cultural heritage of the Mission Inn, Riverside, and the surrounding southern California communities through its museum services, educational programs, and outreach activities.Each year, the Mission Inn Foundation reaches out beyond the walls of the National Historic Landmark Mission Inn to bring innovative enrichment programs to students in the local schools. Located at the corner of Main Street and Mission Inn Avenue, the Mission Inn Museum features exhibitions examining the hotel’s history and lasting impacts on the Riverside community and beyond. The Mission Inn Museum is also the starting point for all docent-led Mission Inn tours and features an extensive museum store with one of a kind products from local artists, unique Mission Inn souvenirs, in addition to a wide selection of books on Mission Inn and local history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Foosaner Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-inn-foundation.jpeg
Mission Inn Foundation and Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foosaner Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mission Inn Foundation and Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foosaner Art Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mission Inn Foundation and Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Foosaner Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foosaner Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mission Inn Foundation and Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Foosaner Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-inn-foundation.jpeg
Mission Inn Foundation and Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foosaner Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foosaner Art Museum company.

In the current year, Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company and Foosaner Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company nor Foosaner Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company nor Foosaner Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company nor Foosaner Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum company nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum company nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mission Inn Foundation and Museum company employs more people globally than Foosaner Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foosaner Art Museum nor Mission Inn Foundation and Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References