Comparison Overview

Food & Drink Guides

VS

Spirit And Flesh

Food & Drink Guides

23 Great George Street, City of Bristol, England, BS1 5QT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Recent winner of The UK Blog Awards for the best Food & Drink Blog. UK’s Largest Publisher of regional eating out guides, covering over 30 regions across the country. Food & Drink Guides is also the company behind the UK’s most popular eating out app, Restaurant Guide, the country’s most comprehensive guide to one-off food events, Food Festival Finder.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Spirit And Flesh

462 45th St, Brooklyn, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are a luxury multi platform with a mission to create high-end distinct content. We celebrate cultural influence by working with visionaries who have impacted their industry through the endeavoring connections in art and culture. We showcase how the world is seen through the eyes of the worlds most celebrated talent. The storytelling we pursue is the kind of which connects the reader and our fellow artist, the uniqueness of how the world is perceived by both the reader and contributor is a canvas that both of them fill for us to show to the world. Spirit & Flesh, print and digital is a fast growing interactive platform and a destination with exclusive and dynamic content.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/food-&-drink-guides-ltd.jpeg
Food & Drink Guides
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spirit-and-flesh.jpeg
Spirit And Flesh
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Food & Drink Guides
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spirit And Flesh
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Food & Drink Guides in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spirit And Flesh in 2025.

Incident History — Food & Drink Guides (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Food & Drink Guides cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spirit And Flesh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spirit And Flesh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/food-&-drink-guides-ltd.jpeg
Food & Drink Guides
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spirit-and-flesh.jpeg
Spirit And Flesh
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spirit And Flesh company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Food & Drink Guides company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spirit And Flesh company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Food & Drink Guides company.

In the current year, Spirit And Flesh company and Food & Drink Guides company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spirit And Flesh company nor Food & Drink Guides company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spirit And Flesh company nor Food & Drink Guides company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spirit And Flesh company nor Food & Drink Guides company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Food & Drink Guides company nor Spirit And Flesh company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Food & Drink Guides nor Spirit And Flesh holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Food & Drink Guides company nor Spirit And Flesh company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Food & Drink Guides company employs more people globally than Spirit And Flesh company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Food & Drink Guides nor Spirit And Flesh holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Food & Drink Guides nor Spirit And Flesh holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Food & Drink Guides nor Spirit And Flesh holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Food & Drink Guides nor Spirit And Flesh holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Food & Drink Guides nor Spirit And Flesh holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Food & Drink Guides nor Spirit And Flesh holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.