Comparison Overview

Folio Literary Management

VS

Melville House

Folio Literary Management

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Folio Literary Management is a leading full-service literary agency focused on cultivating original voices & passionate storytelling. Founded in 2006, Folio has become home to hundreds of bestsellers as well as multiple award nominees and winners across all categories. We are in the business of amplifying storytellers: to partner with fresh and incisive voices to help share their stories, create deeper connections with their audiences, and develop a long-term strategy to grow long-term value.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Melville House

46 John St, Brooklyn, New York, 11201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Melville House is an independent book publisher based in Brooklyn and London. Founded by Dennis Johnson and Valerie Merians in 2001, Melville House has published political reportage, avant-garde fiction, titles in translation, poetry, and cookbooks. The list includes the Art of the Novella series, the Neversink Library, and the Melville House International Crime series.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folio-literary-management.jpeg
Folio Literary Management
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/melville-house.jpeg
Melville House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Folio Literary Management
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Melville House
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Folio Literary Management in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Melville House in 2025.

Incident History — Folio Literary Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Folio Literary Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Melville House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Melville House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/folio-literary-management.jpeg
Folio Literary Management
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/melville-house.jpeg
Melville House
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Folio Literary Management company and Melville House company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Melville House company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Folio Literary Management company.

In the current year, Melville House company and Folio Literary Management company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Melville House company nor Folio Literary Management company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Melville House company nor Folio Literary Management company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Melville House company nor Folio Literary Management company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Folio Literary Management company nor Melville House company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Folio Literary Management nor Melville House holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Folio Literary Management company nor Melville House company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Folio Literary Management company employs more people globally than Melville House company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Folio Literary Management nor Melville House holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Folio Literary Management nor Melville House holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Folio Literary Management nor Melville House holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Folio Literary Management nor Melville House holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Folio Literary Management nor Melville House holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Folio Literary Management nor Melville House holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.