Comparison Overview

Focus C3

VS

Newport Academy

Focus C3

10748 Virginia Plaza, La Vista, 68128, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Focus C3 is committed to the professional delivery of essential human service skills to provide the maximum potential to individuals, teams, and organizations in their accomplishment of personal, professional and organizational goals. These services include but are not limited to counseling, coaching and consulting. Helping individual, teams, and organizations to be able to move forward is the singular focus of Focus C3

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Newport Academy

Nashville, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Newport Academy, we bring teens from self-destruction to self-esteem by treating primary mental health issues which addresses the underlying causes of high-risk behavior. We treat teens struggling with depression, anxiety, and trauma-related issues, along with co-occurring eating disorders and substance abuse. We remove the stigma around mental health treatment and substance abuse issues and provide compassionate care that leads to self-awareness, confidence, and self-esteem. Our primary goal is to empower teens and restore families. Levels of care include Residential Treatment Programs, Outpatient Programs including Partial-Hospitalization and Intensive Outpatient Programs, Therapeutic Day Schools, evidence-based practices, state-accredited educational curriculums, and family involvement. Highlighted modalities: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT), Trauma-Informed Care, Attachment-Based Family Therapy (ABFT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Experiential Therapies, and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR).

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/focus-c3.jpeg
Focus C3
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newport-academy.jpeg
Newport Academy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Focus C3
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Newport Academy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Focus C3 in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newport Academy in 2026.

Incident History — Focus C3 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Focus C3 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Newport Academy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newport Academy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/focus-c3.jpeg
Focus C3
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newport-academy.jpeg
Newport Academy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Newport Academy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Focus C3 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Newport Academy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Focus C3 company.

In the current year, Newport Academy company and Focus C3 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Newport Academy company nor Focus C3 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Newport Academy company nor Focus C3 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Newport Academy company nor Focus C3 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Focus C3 company nor Newport Academy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Focus C3 nor Newport Academy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Newport Academy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Focus C3 company.

Neither Focus C3 nor Newport Academy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Focus C3 nor Newport Academy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Focus C3 nor Newport Academy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Focus C3 nor Newport Academy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Focus C3 nor Newport Academy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Focus C3 nor Newport Academy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N