Comparison Overview

Focal Engineering

VS

Upland Technologies Inc.

Focal Engineering

467 John St, Victoria, V8T 5H1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Focal Engineering Incorporated was established in 2015 and headquartered in beautiful Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. We provide engineering consulting services to the building industry, with a focus on energy efficiency, sustainability and energy modelling for both new construction and existing buildings. At Focal Engineering our philosophy is to produce results that benefit our clients, our community and the environment. We collaborate with our clients and colleagues to achieve a project’s goals, with a focus on energy opportunities. By evaluating how design, construction, operation, maintenance and renewal decisions impact the energy performance of a building, we aim to guide the team towards a cost-effective, energy efficient facility. If you’d like to talk about how we can contribute to your next project, please contact us and we would be happy to meet with you.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Upland Technologies Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to provide our customers in the Tube and Metal Forming Industries with effective and innovative production solutions that makes them competitive in their marketplace. We succeed when our customers succeed. Upland Technologies Inc. brings over 100 years combined experience in the tube and sheet metal forming industries. We specialize in muffler making and tube endforming machines.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/focal-engineering.jpeg
Focal Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upland-technologies-inc-.jpeg
Upland Technologies Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Focal Engineering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Upland Technologies Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Focal Engineering in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Upland Technologies Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Focal Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Focal Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Upland Technologies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Upland Technologies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/focal-engineering.jpeg
Focal Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/upland-technologies-inc-.jpeg
Upland Technologies Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Upland Technologies Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Focal Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Upland Technologies Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Focal Engineering company.

In the current year, Upland Technologies Inc. company and Focal Engineering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Upland Technologies Inc. company nor Focal Engineering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Upland Technologies Inc. company nor Focal Engineering company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Upland Technologies Inc. company nor Focal Engineering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Focal Engineering company nor Upland Technologies Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Focal Engineering nor Upland Technologies Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Focal Engineering company nor Upland Technologies Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Focal Engineering company employs more people globally than Upland Technologies Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Focal Engineering nor Upland Technologies Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Focal Engineering nor Upland Technologies Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Focal Engineering nor Upland Technologies Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Focal Engineering nor Upland Technologies Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Focal Engineering nor Upland Technologies Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Focal Engineering nor Upland Technologies Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H