Comparison Overview

FOB

VS

Sit On Design

FOB

9364 Old Bailes Rd, Fort Mill, 29707, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fobstudenthousing.com

FOB sources furniture and customizes furniture for the multi-housing industry, especially student housing.Founded in 2003 and based in Fort Mill SC, FOB serves all regions of the nation. Its core business is designing furniture specific to a company’s needs, then fulfilling the goods direct from international sources where there’s no middle man. FOB then delivers these custom, high-quality furnishings on-time, everytime.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 88
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sit On Design

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sitondesign.com

Vente d'objets de décoration et de mobilier design via: - notre boutique déco à Liège; - notre site de vente en ligne trilingue. Nous proposons du mobilier design dans un bon rapport qualité/prix en provenance d'Europe avec une prédilection pour le design scandinave. Nous promouvons également des designers locaux qui s'auto-produisent sous le label "My Belgium Design". Nous proposons aussi du mobilier lumineux (bar, table...) parfaitement adapté à des événements (salons, foires...) Sit On Design offre des conditions avantageuses pour les professionnels (contact: [email protected]). Il est possible de commander et payer en ligne. Nous livrons partout en Europe.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fob.jpeg
FOB
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sit-on-design.jpeg
Sit On Design
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FOB
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sit On Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FOB in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sit On Design in 2025.

Incident History — FOB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FOB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sit On Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sit On Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fob.jpeg
FOB
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sit-on-design.jpeg
Sit On Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FOB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sit On Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sit On Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FOB company.

In the current year, Sit On Design company and FOB company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sit On Design company nor FOB company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sit On Design company nor FOB company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sit On Design company nor FOB company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FOB company nor Sit On Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FOB nor Sit On Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FOB company nor Sit On Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FOB company employs more people globally than Sit On Design company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither FOB nor Sit On Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FOB nor Sit On Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FOB nor Sit On Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FOB nor Sit On Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FOB nor Sit On Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FOB nor Sit On Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References