Comparison Overview

Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd

VS

BYD

Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd

Burnley & Derby UK, GB
Last Update: 2026-03-04
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://fmuk.ltd

Futaba Manufacturing are well known in the locality as a first-class automotive engineering and manufacturing business, which is renowned for delivering excellence and efficiency based on state of the art technology; with safety, quality and environment as our first priorities; delivered by a loyal and hardworking workforce who understand the needs of our customers and are justly proud of meeting them. Futaba Manufacturing is proud of its reputation as a quality supplier and recognises that the quality of our output reflects the quality of our members. Our aim is to provide our customers with the service and product quality that they want, at a price which gives us a profit and our customers value for money. To help us do this we are registered to BS EN ISO 9001, TS16949 and ISO14001 and working towards IATF.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

BYD

No.3009, BYD Road, Pingshan, Shenzhen, 518118, CN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bydglobal.com

Established in 1995, BYD is a top high-tech enterprise in China specializing in IT, automobile, and new energy.BYD is the largest supplier of rechargeable batteries in the globe, and has the largest market share for Nickel-cadmium batteries, handset Li-ion batteries, cell-phone chargers and keypads worldwide. It also has the second largest market share for cell-phone shells in the globe. BYD Auto becomes the most innovative independent national auto brand and leads the field of electric vehicles with unique technologies. In the field of new energy, BYD has developed green products such as solar farm, battery energy storage station, electric vehicle, and LED, etc. It will continue to lead the new energy revolution in the world!

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,661
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fmukltd.jpeg
Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/byd.jpeg
BYD
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BYD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BYD in 2026.

Incident History — Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BYD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BYD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fmukltd.jpeg
Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/byd.jpeg
BYD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BYD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BYD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company.

In the current year, BYD company and Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BYD company nor Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BYD company nor Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BYD company nor Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company nor BYD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd nor BYD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company nor BYD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BYD company employs more people globally than Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd nor BYD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd nor BYD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd nor BYD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd nor BYD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd nor BYD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Futaba Manufacturing UK Ltd nor BYD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References