Comparison Overview

FMG Publishing

VS

Portland Monthly

FMG Publishing

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Издательский дом Future Media Group (FMG Publishing) – первое в Восточной Европе полностью электронное издательство. Издательство начало свою работу в 2008 году как производитель электронного контента для СМИ и уже в конце 2009 года увидел свет первый номер электронного журнала спортивной тематики. В 2010 году издательский дом Future Media Group заключил партнерское соглашения об использовании интерактивных разработок компании MediaSoft для создания электронных журналов в формате New Media. Бизнес активность FMG складывается из четырех подразделений: FMG Журналы, FMG Корпоративные Издания, FMG Books, FMG Цифровой Портной. В рамках четырех направлений FMG издает электронные журналы, книги, непериодические электронные издания смешанного типа. Так же занимается производством электронного контента для цифровых медиа: информационные заметки, новости, фото и иллюстрации, анимационную инфографику и видео адаптированное под мобильные устройства.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Portland Monthly

68 Bishop St, Portland, Maine, 04103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Established in 1985 by Colin and Nancy Sargent, Portland Magazine fearlessly refuses to offer undifferentiated “content.” Our prizewinning stories are singular for having real substance. We celebrate the region’s native appeal with revealing, highly detailed stories on fascinating personalties; unbiased reviews; cuisine news in our acclaimed “Hungry Eye” pages; and our signature interviews that are strikingly not puff pieces. Not monetized, not compromised, and created for our readers over everything else, our stories dare to be different and dare to provoke. You deserve nothing less. Each issue captures our audience with fresh fiction (sometimes very fresh), great listings, and exclusive angles on curious incidents that affect everyday life. From realistic assessments of the local economy and its political vagaries to stories on personalities who have chosen our area over all others, to Maine’s own variations of the work ethic, to light-hearted glimpses of Yankee contradictions, we consistently present fresh narratives about the greatest place in the world to visit, to do business in, and to live. More than just a city-lifestyle magazine, Portland Magazine offers an extraordinary perspective that has made it a favorite for readers and lovers of Maine.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fmg-publishing.jpeg
FMG Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-magazine.jpeg
Portland Monthly
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FMG Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Portland Monthly
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FMG Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland Monthly in 2025.

Incident History — FMG Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FMG Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Portland Monthly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Portland Monthly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fmg-publishing.jpeg
FMG Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-magazine.jpeg
Portland Monthly
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FMG Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Portland Monthly company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Portland Monthly company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FMG Publishing company.

In the current year, Portland Monthly company and FMG Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Portland Monthly company nor FMG Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Portland Monthly company nor FMG Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Portland Monthly company nor FMG Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FMG Publishing company nor Portland Monthly company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Portland Monthly holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FMG Publishing company nor Portland Monthly company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Portland Monthly company employs more people globally than FMG Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Portland Monthly holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Portland Monthly holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Portland Monthly holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Portland Monthly holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Portland Monthly holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Portland Monthly holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.