Comparison Overview

FMG Publishing

VS

Art For All

FMG Publishing

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Издательский дом Future Media Group (FMG Publishing) – первое в Восточной Европе полностью электронное издательство. Издательство начало свою работу в 2008 году как производитель электронного контента для СМИ и уже в конце 2009 года увидел свет первый номер электронного журнала спортивной тематики. В 2010 году издательский дом Future Media Group заключил партнерское соглашения об использовании интерактивных разработок компании MediaSoft для создания электронных журналов в формате New Media. Бизнес активность FMG складывается из четырех подразделений: FMG Журналы, FMG Корпоративные Издания, FMG Books, FMG Цифровой Портной. В рамках четырех направлений FMG издает электронные журналы, книги, непериодические электронные издания смешанного типа. Так же занимается производством электронного контента для цифровых медиа: информационные заметки, новости, фото и иллюстрации, анимационную инфографику и видео адаптированное под мобильные устройства.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Art For All

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Providing artists and photographers with a first class reproduction and printing service. We already undertake work for such famous artists as Liam Spencer, Dave Pearson, And for the Ray Lowry Estate. Photographers and artists can display and sell their work free of charge on our web site at www.artforall.biz

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fmg-publishing.jpeg
FMG Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Art For All
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FMG Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Art For All
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FMG Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Art For All in 2025.

Incident History — FMG Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FMG Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Art For All (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Art For All cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fmg-publishing.jpeg
FMG Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Art For All
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Art For All company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FMG Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Art For All company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FMG Publishing company.

In the current year, Art For All company and FMG Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Art For All company nor FMG Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Art For All company nor FMG Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Art For All company nor FMG Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FMG Publishing company nor Art For All company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Art For All holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FMG Publishing company nor Art For All company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Art For All company employs more people globally than FMG Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Art For All holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Art For All holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Art For All holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Art For All holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Art For All holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FMG Publishing nor Art For All holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.