Comparison Overview

FläktGroup Middle East and Africa

VS

BLUE BOX

FläktGroup Middle East and Africa

Exchange Tower, Office 2206, Dubai, UAE, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-28

FläktGroup, a market leader in energy efficient indoor air technology solutions, was formed in 2016 (when Fläkt Woods and DencoHappel joined forces). We research, develop and manufacture innovative products and solutions that improve indoor air comfort and wellbeing, while meeting or exceeding the highest quality standards Key business segments for FläktGroup include Commercial Building Applications, Close Control/Data Centers and Highly Specified/Industrial Applications. These are areas where FläktGroup have cutting-edge products and application expertise, which means we can bring superior value to customers around the world.

NAICS: 3334
NAICS Definition: Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BLUE BOX

3720 Canton St, Dallas, Texas, 75226, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Blue Box Air, LLC is an innovative solution for reducing energy consumption and costs, while reducing CO2. Our innovation is our patented process for cleaning the coils in HVAC systems, which improves air quality and facility health while reducing the environmental footprint. There has never been an effective way to clean and sanitize the coils in an HVAC system. This means nearly all HVAC systems worldwide are running fouled, inefficient and unhealthy. Blue Box solves this with its patented process for pushing antimicrobial foam through any depth of coil, delivering near perfect surface area coverage. By solving how coils can be cleaned, Blue Box addresses some of the biggest problems faced by commercial HVAC systems, such as “Hospital Acquired Infections”, “Dirty Socks Syndrome”, and “Sick Building Syndrome”. The result is a low-cost​ model for companies to extend their equipment life, reducing CO2 and energy consumption, all while providing improved air quality.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fläktgroup-uae.jpeg
FläktGroup Middle East and Africa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-box-air.jpeg
BLUE BOX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FläktGroup Middle East and Africa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BLUE BOX
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FläktGroup Middle East and Africa in 2025.

Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BLUE BOX in 2025.

Incident History — FläktGroup Middle East and Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FläktGroup Middle East and Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BLUE BOX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BLUE BOX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fläktgroup-uae.jpeg
FläktGroup Middle East and Africa
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blue-box-air.jpeg
BLUE BOX
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BLUE BOX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BLUE BOX company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company.

In the current year, BLUE BOX company and FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BLUE BOX company nor FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BLUE BOX company nor FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BLUE BOX company nor FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company nor BLUE BOX company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa nor BLUE BOX holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa company nor BLUE BOX company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa nor BLUE BOX holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa nor BLUE BOX holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa nor BLUE BOX holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa nor BLUE BOX holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa nor BLUE BOX holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FläktGroup Middle East and Africa nor BLUE BOX holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H