Comparison Overview

Archer

VS

Menzies Aviation

Archer

190 W Tasman Dr, San Jose, California, US, 95134
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Archer is designing and developing electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft for use in urban air mobility networks. Archer’s mission is to unlock the skies, freeing everyone to reimagine how they move and spend time. Archer's team is based in Santa Clara, CA. To learn more, visit www.archer.com.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,423
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Menzies Aviation

21-22 Bloomsbury Square, None, London, England, GB,
Last Update: 2025-12-09

People. Passion. Pride. These have driven our team since 1833. Since that time, we have developed to become a critical partner in the global aviation industry, delivering time-critical logistics services at over 300 locations in 65 countries, across six continents. But at the heart of our business is our people. Whether serving our clients landside or airside, above or below the wing, our teams are agile, dedicated, and eager to help. Safety and security are at the heart of everything we do. We have a duty of care to look after each other, our customers and their customers. And we care about the communities in which we operate. We understand that what we do makes a difference at many levels. Our services help keep people moving with everyone playing their part, delivering with precision, round the clock, every minute of every day. In this we take immense pride, and it strengthens our determination to deliver. Our core services include ground, air cargo and fuel services.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 16,441
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flyarcher.jpeg
Archer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/menzies-aviation.jpeg
Menzies Aviation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Archer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Menzies Aviation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archer in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Menzies Aviation in 2025.

Incident History — Archer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Menzies Aviation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Menzies Aviation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flyarcher.jpeg
Archer
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Login Node
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/menzies-aviation.jpeg
Menzies Aviation
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Website Configuration Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Archer company and Menzies Aviation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Archer and Menzies Aviation have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Menzies Aviation company and Archer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Menzies Aviation company nor Archer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Menzies Aviation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Archer company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Archer company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Menzies Aviation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Archer company nor Menzies Aviation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Archer nor Menzies Aviation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Archer company nor Menzies Aviation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Menzies Aviation company employs more people globally than Archer company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Archer nor Menzies Aviation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Archer nor Menzies Aviation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Archer nor Menzies Aviation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Archer nor Menzies Aviation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Archer nor Menzies Aviation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Archer nor Menzies Aviation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N