Comparison Overview

Archer

VS

Lufthansa Group

Archer

190 W Tasman Dr, San Jose, California, US, 95134
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Archer is designing and developing electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft for use in urban air mobility networks. Archer’s mission is to unlock the skies, freeing everyone to reimagine how they move and spend time. Archer's team is based in Santa Clara, CA. To learn more, visit www.archer.com.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,423
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Lufthansa Group

Airportring, Frankfurt, -, 60546, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Lufthansa Group is an aviation company with operations worldwide. It plays a leading role in its European home market. With 109,509 employees, the Lufthansa Group generated revenue of EUR 32.770m in the financial year 2022. The Passenger Airlines segment includes, on the one hand, the network airlines Lufthansa German Airlines, SWISS, Austrian Airlines and Brussels Airlines. As part of the multihub strategy, they offer their passengers a broad range of flights from their global hubs in Frankfurt, Munich and Zurich as well as their national hubs in Vienna and Brussels. Lufthansa German Airlines also includes the regional airlines Lufthansa CityLine, Air Dolomiti and Eurowings Discover, the Lufthansa Group’s holiday airline. Besides the network airlines, Eurowings also belongs to the Passenger Airlines segment. This airline provides a comprehensive range of point-to-point connections for European short-haul destinations, in particular from German-speaking countries. Besides its Passenger Airlines business segment, the Lufthansa Group also comprises aviation services. This includes the Logistics, MRO and Catering segments in particular. The Lufthansa Group also includes the Additional Businesses and Group Functions. These comprise Lufthansa Aviation Training and Lufthansa Systems especially.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 54,173
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flyarcher.jpeg
Archer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa-group.jpeg
Lufthansa Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Archer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lufthansa Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archer in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group in 2025.

Incident History — Archer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lufthansa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flyarcher.jpeg
Archer
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Login Node
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa-group.jpeg
Lufthansa Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lufthansa Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Archer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Archer company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lufthansa Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lufthansa Group company and Archer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Archer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lufthansa Group company nor Archer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Archer company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Lufthansa Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Archer company nor Lufthansa Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lufthansa Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Archer company.

Lufthansa Group company employs more people globally than Archer company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N