Comparison Overview

Archer

VS

Lufthansa

Archer

190 W Tasman Dr, San Jose, California, US, 95134
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Archer is designing and developing electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft for use in urban air mobility networks. Archer’s mission is to unlock the skies, freeing everyone to reimagine how they move and spend time. Archer's team is based in Santa Clara, CA. To learn more, visit www.archer.com.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 1,423
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Lufthansa

Airportring, Frankfurt am Main, 60549, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Lufthansa is one of the world’s leading airlines, connecting passengers to over 200 destinations across 74 countries from our hubs in Frankfurt and Munich. As an industry pioneer, we are committed to shaping the future of sustainable aviation, investing in next-generation aircraft, cutting-edge technology, and digital solutions. Our goal is to drive excellence: not just in the sky, but across every touchpoint of the travel experience. With Lufthansa Allegris, our new long-haul experience, we are setting a new standard in premium travel, introducing a completely redesigned First, Business, Premium Economy, and Economy Class for ultimate comfort and choice. We continue to enhance the travel experience with state-of-the-art lounges, award-winning service, and onboard broadband Wi-Fi (FlyNet) across our entire long-haul fleet. Follow us for updates on how we're shaping the future of aviation. For more information, reservations or customer service, visit lufthansa.com or follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram. We look forward to welcoming you onboard. This LinkedIn page is maintained by Deutsche Lufthansa AG. We will not answer specific Customer Service queries here on LinkedIn. If you have an immediate concern or need to contact us please visit http://www.lufthansa.com/us/en/imprint

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 19,352
Subsidiaries: 49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flyarcher.jpeg
Archer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa.jpeg
Lufthansa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Archer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lufthansa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archer in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa in 2025.

Incident History — Archer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lufthansa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flyarcher.jpeg
Archer
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Login Node
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lufthansa.jpeg
Lufthansa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lufthansa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Archer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Archer company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lufthansa company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lufthansa company and Archer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lufthansa company nor Archer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lufthansa company nor Archer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Archer company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Lufthansa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Archer company nor Lufthansa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lufthansa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Archer company.

Lufthansa company employs more people globally than Archer company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Archer nor Lufthansa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H