Comparison Overview

Flow Ezy Filters, Inc.

VS

BME Systems Inc.

Flow Ezy Filters, Inc.

147 Enterprise Dr, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.flowezyfilters.com

We have been manufacturing filtration products since 1945. That is 70 years+ of concentrating on one type of product. We only make filters and we're good at it. We do not pretend to make anything else. Filtration is our concentration. All products have been, are, and will be made only in the U.S. We have designed and engineered our complete product line of quality filtration products to meet exacting standards, giving our customers superior, cost-effective performance. We don't rest on our reputation of providing the best products, we strive to keep it. Please contact us anytime, in fact we encourage you to. We love talking filters. As our customer, what you say or ask is important to us. If you do not find what you are looking for on our website, contact us. We still may be able to help. Need a custom filter? Contact us. We may be able to help you with this, too.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

BME Systems Inc.

3300 Hudson Street, Baltimore, MD 21224, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bmesystems.com

BME Systems uses engineering principles to combine commercially available tools and products that integrate, facilitate and automate laboratory experiments and processes in biological research and production. Productivity in today's bioresearch, development and production environment requires more than the implementation of "single-use"​ tools to perform ad hoc experiments. Informatics, connectivity and automation streamline research and production while maintaining a uniform corporate knowledgebase that can be shared between researchers. BME Systems provides the technical "glue"​ to integrate the components of a process into coherent and robust system. Typical engineering tasks can range from monitoring picoamp currents in cellular membranes to control and monitoring of the growth of 1000 liter fermentations. Data can be brought from real time processes and coupled with laboratory data automatically to create comprehensive systems that save time and drive business.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flow-ezy-filters-inc-.jpeg
Flow Ezy Filters, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bme-systems-inc..jpeg
BME Systems Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Flow Ezy Filters, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BME Systems Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BME Systems Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BME Systems Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BME Systems Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flow-ezy-filters-inc-.jpeg
Flow Ezy Filters, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bme-systems-inc..jpeg
BME Systems Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BME Systems Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BME Systems Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company.

In the current year, BME Systems Inc. company and Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BME Systems Inc. company nor Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BME Systems Inc. company nor Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BME Systems Inc. company nor Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company nor BME Systems Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. nor BME Systems Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company nor BME Systems Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. company employs more people globally than BME Systems Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. nor BME Systems Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. nor BME Systems Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. nor BME Systems Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. nor BME Systems Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. nor BME Systems Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Flow Ezy Filters, Inc. nor BME Systems Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References