Comparison Overview

Florida Sportsman

VS

Ambit

Florida Sportsman

34994, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

The country's largest state-based outdoors magazine, Florida Sportsman covers hunting and fishing in Florida and the tropics. With more than 100,000 monthly subscribers and news-stand sales of greater than 20,000, Florida Sportsman is considered a standard bearer of outdoor journalism, with a long and storied history of fighting for marine conservation and recreational anglers' rights.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ambit

17 Priory Gardens, London, N6 5QY, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The venerable Ambit arts and literary quarterly was established in 1959 by Dr Martin Bax in London. Editors have included JG Ballard, Carol Ann-Duffy and Sir Eduardo Paolozzi. It is said to be the most stolen magazine from Harvard Library. We have published everyone from William S Burroughs, Stevie Smith, David Hockney, Francis Bacon, Linton Kwesi Johnson. Our pages became most infamous when somewhat banned in 1969 for launching a competition for work written on drugs. We publish four editions a year, two are 96-pages long, made from unsolicited submissions selected by our editors, the other two are Pop issues, taking differing formats, featuring either competition winners, or work commissioned by a guest editor, the first being Lias Saoudi of Fat White Family in 2021. Ambit is based in London, registered as a charity in Norfolk, and read internationally. We print original poetry, short fiction, art, occasional interviews and features, and reviews. The magazine is available through subscription and in selected bookshops and libraries worldwide. Previous editorial staff include Sir Eduardo Paolozzi, Carol Ann Duffy and JG Ballard.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Florida Sportsman
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambit-magazine.jpeg
Ambit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Sportsman
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ambit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Sportsman in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambit in 2025.

Incident History — Florida Sportsman (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Sportsman cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ambit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Florida Sportsman
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambit-magazine.jpeg
Ambit
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Florida Sportsman company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ambit company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ambit company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Florida Sportsman company.

In the current year, Ambit company and Florida Sportsman company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ambit company nor Florida Sportsman company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ambit company nor Florida Sportsman company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ambit company nor Florida Sportsman company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Sportsman company nor Ambit company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Sportsman nor Ambit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Florida Sportsman company nor Ambit company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Sportsman company employs more people globally than Ambit company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Florida Sportsman nor Ambit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Sportsman nor Ambit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Sportsman nor Ambit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Sportsman nor Ambit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Sportsman nor Ambit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Sportsman nor Ambit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.