Comparison Overview

Florida Phoenix

VS

Brisbane

Florida Phoenix

Tallahassee, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://floridaphoenix.com/

The Phoenix is a nonprofit news site that’s free of advertising and free to readers. We cover state government and politics with a staff of five journalists located at the Florida Press Center in downtown Tallahassee. We have a mix of in-depth stories, briefs, and social media updates on the latest events, editorial cartoons, and progressive commentary. Reporters in many now-shrunken capital bureaus have to spend most of their time these days chasing around after more and more outrageous political behavior, and too many don’t have time to lift up emerging innovative ideas or report on the people who are trying to help solve problems and shift policy for a more compassionate world. The Florida Phoenix does those stories.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Brisbane

316 Adelaide St, Brisbane City, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.MyBrisbane.com

Between our Instagram and our Facebook platforms, the @Brisbane network is one of the largest, utmost concentrated and most dynamically engaged private digital platforms specific to the City of Brisbane. Our direct audience are tangibly active, and highly focused, standing at a little over 410,000 - Facebook, Instagram, Threads, LinkedIn & TikTok. To continue the narrative, we consider our network's primary attitude orientated towards capturing the city’s best side – from scenic hotspots, restaurants and cafes, to events and real estate! As we grow as an organisation, we continuously seek to expand our network.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 177
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-phoenix.jpeg
Florida Phoenix
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brisbane.jpeg
Brisbane
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Phoenix
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brisbane
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Phoenix in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brisbane in 2026.

Incident History — Florida Phoenix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Phoenix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brisbane (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brisbane cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-phoenix.jpeg
Florida Phoenix
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brisbane.jpeg
Brisbane
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Florida Phoenix company and Brisbane company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Brisbane company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Florida Phoenix company.

In the current year, Brisbane company and Florida Phoenix company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brisbane company nor Florida Phoenix company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brisbane company nor Florida Phoenix company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brisbane company nor Florida Phoenix company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Phoenix company nor Brisbane company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Phoenix nor Brisbane holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Florida Phoenix company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Brisbane company.

Brisbane company employs more people globally than Florida Phoenix company, reflecting its scale as a Internet News.

Neither Florida Phoenix nor Brisbane holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Phoenix nor Brisbane holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Phoenix nor Brisbane holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Phoenix nor Brisbane holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Phoenix nor Brisbane holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Phoenix nor Brisbane holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References