Comparison Overview

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator

VS

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator

500 S. Duval St., Tallahassee, 32399-1900, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://flcourts.org

Florida's State Courts Administrator serves under the direction of the Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court and the other six justices and oversees the operation of court initiatives and administrative functions. Additionally, the State Courts Administrator serves as the liaison between the court system and the legislative branch, the executive branch, the auxiliary agencies of the Court and the national court research and planning agencies. The Office of the State Courts Administrator was created on July 1, 1972.

NAICS: 92211
NAICS Definition: Courts
Employees: 116
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 5600, PO Box 62625, Harrisburg, PA, US, 17106
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799
padisciplinaryboard.org

The Disciplinary Board is an independent agency run at the direction of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The Supreme Court disciplines attorneys whose actions violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. The purpose of the disciplinary system is to assist the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in performing its constitutional duty to regulate attorney conduct as well as to be a support system for attorneys throughout the state. It is funded by annual assessments paid by attorneys licensed to practice in the Commonwealth; the Disciplinary Board receives no tax funds. The mission of the Disciplinary Board is to protect the public, maintain the integrity of the legal profession, and safeguard the reputation of the courts. The Disciplinary Board does not collect comments or messages through this account.

NAICS: 92211
NAICS Definition: Courts
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-office-of-state-courts-administrator.jpeg
Florida Office of State Courts Administrator
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsylvania-disciplinary-board.jpeg
The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Office of State Courts Administrator
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Office of State Courts Administrator in 2025.

Incidents vs Administration of Justice Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 2025.

Incident History — Florida Office of State Courts Administrator (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-office-of-state-courts-administrator.jpeg
Florida Office of State Courts Administrator
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsylvania-disciplinary-board.jpeg
The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company.

In the current year, The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company and Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company nor Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Office of State Courts Administrator company employs more people globally than The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania company, reflecting its scale as a Administration of Justice.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Office of State Courts Administrator nor The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in TykoDev cherry-studio-TykoFork 0.1. This issue affects the function redirectToAuthorization of the file /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server of the component OAuth Server Discovery. Such manipulation of the argument authorizationUrl leads to os command injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in code-projects Question Paper Generator up to 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /selectquestionuser.php. This manipulation of the argument subid causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was found in alokjaiswal Hotel-Management-services-using-MYSQL-and-php up to 5f8b60a7aa6c06a5632de569d4e3f6a8cd82f76f. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /dishsub.php. The manipulation of the argument item.name results in cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in alokjaiswal Hotel-Management-services-using-MYSQL-and-php up to 5f8b60a7aa6c06a5632de569d4e3f6a8cd82f76f. Affected is an unknown function of the file /usersub.php of the component Request Pending Page. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in Verysync 微力同步 up to 2.21.3. This impacts an unknown function of the file /rest/f/api/resources/f96956469e7be39d/tmp/text.txt?override=false of the component Web Administration Module. Executing manipulation can lead to unrestricted upload. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-07
Updated
Date
2025-12-07
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References