Comparison Overview

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts

VS

Lowell Observatory

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts

1630 E. 7th Avenue, Tampa, 33605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fmopa.org

The Florida Museum of Photographic Arts is a museum dedicated to exhibiting important photographic arts as central to contemporary life and culture. The museum collects, reserves and exhibits historic and contemporary works by nationally and internationally important photographic artists. It also enriches the community by operating outreach programs to educate children and adults. Check out our Photography Classes in Tampa!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lowell Observatory

1400 Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ, US, 86001
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lowell.edu

Named one of TIME's 100 Greatest Places and Best Science Museum by Newsweek readers, Lowell Observatory is an independent, non-profit research institution founded in 1894 by Boston mathematician Percival Lowell. More than 45,000 nights have passed since the first telescope arrived on Mars Hill. In that time, Lowell astronomers have been at the forefront of astronomical research. It was here that Clyde Tombaugh discovered Pluto in 1930 and V.M. Slipher first detected the expanding nature of the universe nearly two decades earlier. That tradition continues today with the observatory’s state-of-the-art Lowell Discovery Telescope and the ongoing discoveries being made by the current generation of Lowell astronomers and planetary scientists. In 2024, Lowell opened the Astronomy Discovery Center, which features a roof-top, open-air planetarium. Rather than a traditional enclosed planetarium in which guests view images of celestial bodies, this one takes advantage of Flagstaff’s exquisitely dark skies to look at the real thing—stars and their celestial buddies in their natural setting.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-photographic-arts.jpeg
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lowell-observatory.jpeg
Lowell Observatory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lowell Observatory
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Museum of Photographic Arts in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lowell Observatory in 2026.

Incident History — Florida Museum of Photographic Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lowell Observatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lowell Observatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-photographic-arts.jpeg
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lowell-observatory.jpeg
Lowell Observatory
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lowell Observatory company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lowell Observatory company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company.

In the current year, Lowell Observatory company and Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lowell Observatory company nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lowell Observatory company nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lowell Observatory company nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Lowell Observatory company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts nor Lowell Observatory holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Lowell Observatory company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lowell Observatory company employs more people globally than Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts nor Lowell Observatory holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts nor Lowell Observatory holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts nor Lowell Observatory holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts nor Lowell Observatory holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts nor Lowell Observatory holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts nor Lowell Observatory holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References