Comparison Overview

Florida Museum of Natural History

VS

Asheville Art Museum

Florida Museum of Natural History

3215 Hull Road, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-2710, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Florida Museum of Natural History inspires people to value the biological richness and cultural heritage of our diverse world and make a positive difference in its future. The museum is based on the University of Florida campus in Gainesville, with research sites throughout the world. It is Florida's official state natural history museum and one of the nation’s largest and fastest-growing natural history museums, including one of the world's largest collections of butterflies and moths. --- The Florida Museum of Natural History intends to educate, inform and provide updated information on its activities and to support and promote its objectives for these activities through its Facebook page. All Florida Museum comments are made by Museum designees. This site is not a public forum. Social media users may share ideas through commentary that is consistent with and furthers the objectives of the Museum and the University of Florida. The Museum reserves the right to remove any comments that do not fall within this purpose, including those that are: off-topic, containing links to third-party websites or content, or made in violation of Florida or federal law. By posting a comment on our social media pages, you agree to follow the University of Florida Community Commenting Guidelines, host social media channel Terms of Service, Florida and federal law, and UF regulations and policies – including but not limited to the university’s Acceptable Use of Computing Resources Policy. Your comments may be removed if they are in violation of these guidelines.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 223
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Asheville Art Museum

2 S. Pack Square, Asheville, 28802-1717, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Founded by artists in 1948 in Asheville, NC, the Asheville Art Museum annually presents an exciting, inviting and active schedule of exhibitions and public programs based on its Permanent Collection of 20th and 21st century American art. Any visit will also include experiences with works of significance to Western North Carolina’s cultural heritage including Studio Craft, Black Mountain College and Cherokee artists. Special exhibitions feature renowned regional and national artists and explore issues of enduring interest. The Museum also offers a wide array of innovative and entertaining educational programs for audiences of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Florida Museum of Natural History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asheville-art-museum.jpeg
Asheville Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Museum of Natural History
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Asheville Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Museum of Natural History in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asheville Art Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Florida Museum of Natural History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Museum of Natural History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Asheville Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asheville Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
Florida Museum of Natural History
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asheville-art-museum.jpeg
Asheville Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Florida Museum of Natural History company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asheville Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Asheville Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Florida Museum of Natural History company.

In the current year, Asheville Art Museum company and Florida Museum of Natural History company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Asheville Art Museum company nor Florida Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Asheville Art Museum company nor Florida Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Asheville Art Museum company nor Florida Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History company nor Asheville Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History nor Asheville Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History company nor Asheville Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Museum of Natural History company employs more people globally than Asheville Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History nor Asheville Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History nor Asheville Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History nor Asheville Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History nor Asheville Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History nor Asheville Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Museum of Natural History nor Asheville Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X