Comparison Overview

Florida Democratic Party

VS

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

Florida Democratic Party

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Florida Democrats believe in effective and efficient government that prioritizes quality education, affordable health care, and an economy in which anyone who works hard can succeed. Most importantly, we believe that we are stronger together. We believe the fundamental American promise — that you can go as far as your own hard work will take you — should shine brightest in Florida. That is why we champion the middle class and cherish the principle that all Floridians should have the opportunity to work hard and succeed. That is why we will never stop fighting for better public schools, because education is the surest path to a better life for millions. From standing for affordable health care and better schools to fighting for civil rights and access to the ballot box, Florida Democrats are leading every day to move our state forward.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

A - 232, New Delhi, 110024, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy is an independent think-tank doing legal research to make better laws and improve governance for the public good. We engage with Ministries in the Government of India, State governments, Standing Committees of Parliament, other agencies and instrumentalities of the state, either at Union or State level, advising on proposed legislation and regulation, assist in legislative drafting and provide independent critical analyses of existing law and policy with recommendations for reform.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-democratic-party.jpeg
Florida Democratic Party
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Democratic Party
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Democratic Party in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy in 2025.

Incident History — Florida Democratic Party (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Democratic Party cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-democratic-party.jpeg
Florida Democratic Party
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vidhi-centre-for-legal-policy.jpeg
Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
Incidents

FAQ

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida Democratic Party company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Florida Democratic Party company.

In the current year, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company and Florida Democratic Party company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company nor Florida Democratic Party company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company nor Florida Democratic Party company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company nor Florida Democratic Party company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Democratic Party company nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Democratic Party nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Florida Democratic Party company nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company employs more people globally than Florida Democratic Party company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Florida Democratic Party nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Democratic Party nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Democratic Party nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Democratic Party nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Democratic Party nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Democratic Party nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H