Comparison Overview

Florida Community Association Journal

VS

Stanford Law Review

Florida Community Association Journal

1000 Nix Road, Little Rock, AR, 72211, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fcapgroup.com/flcaj/flcaj-articles/

Since 1987, Florida Community Association Journal has been one of the most reliable sources of education for Florida’s community association board members and managers. Florida’s condominiums and HOAs have turned to FLCAJ for practical information as they go about making critical decisions for their community. We routinely cover topics ranging from legal, financial, and management advice to maintenance, renovations, and reconstruction. Our platforms include print, digital, and a bi-monthly email newsletter to get vital information to community association managers and boards.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Stanford Law Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.stanfordlawreview.org

The Stanford Law Review is a legal publication run by Stanford Law School students since 1948, providing expert legal scholarship, analysis, and commentary. The Law Review has two principal functions: to educate and foster intellectual discourse among the student membership, and to contribute to legal scholarship by addressing important legal and social issues.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-community-association-journal.jpeg
Florida Community Association Journal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-law-review.jpeg
Stanford Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Community Association Journal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stanford Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Community Association Journal in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanford Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — Florida Community Association Journal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Community Association Journal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stanford Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-community-association-journal.jpeg
Florida Community Association Journal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-law-review.jpeg
Stanford Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Florida Community Association Journal company and Stanford Law Review company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Stanford Law Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Florida Community Association Journal company.

In the current year, Stanford Law Review company and Florida Community Association Journal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stanford Law Review company nor Florida Community Association Journal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stanford Law Review company nor Florida Community Association Journal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stanford Law Review company nor Florida Community Association Journal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal company nor Stanford Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal nor Stanford Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal company nor Stanford Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stanford Law Review company employs more people globally than Florida Community Association Journal company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal nor Stanford Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal nor Stanford Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal nor Stanford Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal nor Stanford Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal nor Stanford Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Community Association Journal nor Stanford Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References