Comparison Overview

Florida Behavioral Health Association

VS

Taylor Life Center

Florida Behavioral Health Association

316 E Park Ave, Tallahassee, 32301, US
Last Update: 2026-01-15
Between 550 and 599

The Florida Behavioral Health Association (FBHA) is a statewide trade association that represents over 70 community mental health and substance use treatment providers throughout the entire state. FBHA’s members span from Pensacola to Key West, serve over 604,000+ individuals each year, and provide services in every county in Florida. These community providers primarily serve the uninsured, underinsured, and the Medicaid populations.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Taylor Life Center

585 Jewett Rd, Mason, MI, 48854, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Taylor Life Center is a not-for-profit organization headquartered in Mason, Michigan that offers mental health support to individuals and families who experience mental illness, developmental disabilities, struggle with substance use, or have other emotional issues. Our mission is to empower people to navigate their journey to wellness. We support this mission by offering a variety of services to fit the needs of each consumer. Our services include: Individual, family, and group therapies Dialectical Behavior Therapy Psychotherapy Psychiatric Medicine Case Management Supports Coordination Residential Services Our support teams are a diverse group of individuals who work together to help our consumers and their families. We strive to recognize team members for their excellent work as individuals and as a team. We believe every team member helps the organization succeed, no matter the size of their contribution to the organization. Beyond corporate recognition, we do appropriately compensate our staff for their job duties and experience. We also offer a competitive benefits package, including health, dental, and vision, to eligible employees and opportunities for continued professional development.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-behavioral-health-association.jpeg
Florida Behavioral Health Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-life-center.jpeg
Taylor Life Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Florida Behavioral Health Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Taylor Life Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Behavioral Health Association in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor Life Center in 2026.

Incident History — Florida Behavioral Health Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Behavioral Health Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Taylor Life Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor Life Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-behavioral-health-association.jpeg
Florida Behavioral Health Association
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-life-center.jpeg
Taylor Life Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Taylor Life Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida Behavioral Health Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Florida Behavioral Health Association company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Taylor Life Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, Taylor Life Center company and Florida Behavioral Health Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Florida Behavioral Health Association company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Taylor Life Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Taylor Life Center company nor Florida Behavioral Health Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Taylor Life Center company nor Florida Behavioral Health Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association company nor Taylor Life Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association nor Taylor Life Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association company nor Taylor Life Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Taylor Life Center company employs more people globally than Florida Behavioral Health Association company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association nor Taylor Life Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association nor Taylor Life Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association nor Taylor Life Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association nor Taylor Life Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association nor Taylor Life Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Florida Behavioral Health Association nor Taylor Life Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N