Comparison Overview

FLORICOLOR

VS

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

FLORICOLOR

Rua Cidres, Matosinhos, Porto, 4455-442, PT
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Floricolor exists since 1979 as an industrial photographic lab, providing services for professional photographers only. In 2002 we reconverted the lab for the exclusive production of Digital Albums. Till 2007 Iberian Peninsula was the main market. Through the continuous investment in innovation and technology, it was possible over the years to improve the production and human resources towards meeting a very demanding market. Today, more than 25 countries on three continents trust us the production of their services. The company was awarded the last six years as PME Líder and the last five year as PME Excelência, status that reflects it's sustained growth. Now, we work on a 6000 square meters facility. For the current year of 2018 we have scheduled several workshops with renown photographers. Our experience has revealed that we are on the right track. We were able to conquer the Europe facing different languages and cultures and adapting ourselves and products to their particular tastes - we have been extremely successful! Why don’t you Join Us Making Dreams Come True?

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

11610 S Alden St, Olathe, 66062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Phenix Label is a 5th generation family-owned label and packaging partner delivering innovative solutions that help brands stand out and scale. For 130 years, we’ve helped food & beverage, personal care, pharmaceutical, household, and automotive brands bring their products to market with precision, speed, and impact. From labels and flexible packaging to RFID smart labeling, our team makes packaging one less thing you have to worry about. What sets us apart? Dedicated customer teams, in-house R&D, sustainability leadership, and unmatched service that simplifies your packaging process while supporting your bottom line. Phenix Label — Better Service. Bottom Line.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/floricolor.jpeg
FLORICOLOR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FLORICOLOR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLORICOLOR in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phenix Label Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — FLORICOLOR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLORICOLOR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phenix Label Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phenix Label Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/floricolor.jpeg
FLORICOLOR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both FLORICOLOR company and Phenix Label Company, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FLORICOLOR company.

In the current year, Phenix Label Company, Inc. company and FLORICOLOR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor FLORICOLOR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor FLORICOLOR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor FLORICOLOR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FLORICOLOR company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FLORICOLOR nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FLORICOLOR company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phenix Label Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than FLORICOLOR company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither FLORICOLOR nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FLORICOLOR nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FLORICOLOR nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FLORICOLOR nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FLORICOLOR nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FLORICOLOR nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L