Comparison Overview

FlixFling

VS

mediAm digital distribution, inc.

FlixFling

1100 N Front St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19123, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

FlixFling is a streaming movie and music service, allowing users to purchase or rent movies and watch them on any device. Customers can also subscribe to curated channels of great content at different price points. FlixFling is compatible with Roku Players, Samsung, Vizio and LG Smart TV's, iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch, Android Devices, XBox, Amazon Fire TV, Google TV, PC's, Yahoo connected TV devices and much more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

mediAm digital distribution, inc.

North Shore Studios, North Vancouver, British Columbia, V7J 3S5, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Overview mediAm is a cloud-based film distribution platform designed to help build a modern, autonomous and profitable motion picture industry in Canada — and to assist other countries and regions do the same. Link Headquartered in Vancouver, mediAm has been financed and built by film production professionals who believe that as conventional models of content distribution continue to transform and erode, the creation of a simple, intuitive, and fully monetized digital distribution network will be integral to their long-term livelihood. Corporate Philosophy mediAm is a privately held company with the clear mandate to promote film production through democratized distribution. mediAm’s corporate structure is guided by the principles of social entrepreneurship: our company is designed to make a profit — but not a huge one. The majority of mediAm’s profits will be reinvested into film production. Mission Statement Our mission is to foster the growth of all types of media production by engaging audiences in a new form of distribution — one that enables viewers to find, watch, promote — and through direct payment — help fund the content they value most. mediAm is nonexclusive, content neutral and promotes regional content as an initial default. We recognize that the viewer—creator/provider relationship is an inextricably symbiotic relationship. To facilitate this mediAm has developed powerful tools to meaningfully match viewers with creators/providers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flixfling.jpeg
FlixFling
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediam-digital-distribution-inc-.jpeg
mediAm digital distribution, inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FlixFling
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
mediAm digital distribution, inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FlixFling in 2025.

Incidents vs Movies, Videos, and Sound Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for mediAm digital distribution, inc. in 2025.

Incident History — FlixFling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FlixFling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — mediAm digital distribution, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

mediAm digital distribution, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flixfling.jpeg
FlixFling
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediam-digital-distribution-inc-.jpeg
mediAm digital distribution, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both FlixFling company and mediAm digital distribution, inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, mediAm digital distribution, inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FlixFling company.

In the current year, mediAm digital distribution, inc. company and FlixFling company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither mediAm digital distribution, inc. company nor FlixFling company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither mediAm digital distribution, inc. company nor FlixFling company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither mediAm digital distribution, inc. company nor FlixFling company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FlixFling company nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FlixFling nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FlixFling company nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FlixFling company employs more people globally than mediAm digital distribution, inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Movies, Videos, and Sound.

Neither FlixFling nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FlixFling nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FlixFling nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FlixFling nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FlixFling nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FlixFling nor mediAm digital distribution, inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N