Comparison Overview

Flinders Foundation

VS

Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Flinders Foundation

Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.flindersfoundation.org.au

Working together to prevent, cure and care. That simple sentence sums up Flinders Foundation’s purpose – to work together with individuals and organisations in the community to support health and medical research and improve patient care across the Flinders medical precinct. Together, we raise vital funds to support the leading clinicians and researchers across Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University to make medical discoveries and improve the care available to patients and their families.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park

PO Box 1660, Kodak, 37764, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.friendsofthesmokies.org

Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park is a 501 (c) (3) not-for-profit organization that assists the National Park Service in its mission to preserve and protect Great Smoky Mountains National Park by raising funds and public awareness, and providing volunteers for needed projects. Established in 1993, Friends of the Smokies is proud to provide $1 million+ annually for important projects and programs to improve the visitor experience in one of America's iconic national parks.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flindersfoundation.jpeg
Flinders Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-great-smoky-mountains-national-park.jpeg
Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Flinders Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flinders Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park in 2025.

Incident History — Flinders Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flinders Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flindersfoundation.jpeg
Flinders Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-great-smoky-mountains-national-park.jpeg
Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Flinders Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Flinders Foundation company.

In the current year, Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company and Flinders Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company nor Flinders Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company nor Flinders Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company nor Flinders Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Flinders Foundation company nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Flinders Foundation nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Flinders Foundation company nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park company employs more people globally than Flinders Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Flinders Foundation nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Flinders Foundation nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Flinders Foundation nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Flinders Foundation nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Flinders Foundation nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Flinders Foundation nor Friends of Great Smoky Mountains National Park holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References