Comparison Overview

FlexoOne

VS

Print Tech

FlexoOne

3789 South 300 West #B, SLC, UT, 84115, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

FlexoOne was founded in 2006 in Salt Lake City, Utah. The founders, who had extensive experience in the printing industry, had a unique idea for a business model that would provide excellent service to their customers and provide them with the finest quality flexographic products. The business model continues today to make FlexoOne a leader in the flexographic industry. Thanks to that vision, FlexoOne has grown each and every year since. Quite an accomplishment in these economic times. And the future looks even brighter!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Print Tech

49 Fadem Road, Springfield, NJ, 07081, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Print Tech has been providing printing and direct mail service since 1978 at its Business Center located in Westfield and the Corporate Headquarters in Springfield, NJ. Print Tech's services include: graphic design, digital and commercial printing, variable data printing, direct mail, targeted marketing, signage, bindery and fulfillment. Meeting impossible deadlines since 1978

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 87
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flexoone.jpeg
FlexoOne
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-tech.jpeg
Print Tech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FlexoOne
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Print Tech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FlexoOne in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print Tech in 2025.

Incident History — FlexoOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FlexoOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Print Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flexoone.jpeg
FlexoOne
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/print-tech.jpeg
Print Tech
Incidents

FAQ

Print Tech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FlexoOne company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Print Tech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FlexoOne company.

In the current year, Print Tech company and FlexoOne company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Print Tech company nor FlexoOne company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Print Tech company nor FlexoOne company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Print Tech company nor FlexoOne company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FlexoOne company nor Print Tech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FlexoOne nor Print Tech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FlexoOne company nor Print Tech company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Print Tech company employs more people globally than FlexoOne company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither FlexoOne nor Print Tech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FlexoOne nor Print Tech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FlexoOne nor Print Tech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FlexoOne nor Print Tech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FlexoOne nor Print Tech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FlexoOne nor Print Tech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N