Comparison Overview

Flexographic Technical Association

VS

Printing Industry

Flexographic Technical Association

80 Orville Drive, Bohemia, NY, 11716-2505, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Flexographic Technical Association, founded in 1958, is the leading technical society devoted to the flexographic printing & in-line converting industry. Since then, FTA has grown to include every employee at over 1,400 company locations. Our members come from all aspects of the flexo industry, and include printers, suppliers, graphic trade shops, consumer product companies, designers, end-users, consultants and educational institutions. Together they provide a wealth of products, services and shared knowledge to the flexographic printing industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Printing Industry

CA, L5L 5P7
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

With over 20 years in the printing and graphics industry, if it can be printed, we can do it for you. Magazines, catalogues, newsletters, direct mail, brochures, post cards, flyers, presentation materials, posters, signs, banners, and more... Sheet-fed, web offset, small & large format digital, graphics design & layout, bindery & finishing, mailing & shipping>

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flexographic-technical-association.jpeg
Flexographic Technical Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Printing Industry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Flexographic Technical Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Printing Industry
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flexographic Technical Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Printing Industry in 2025.

Incident History — Flexographic Technical Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flexographic Technical Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Printing Industry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Printing Industry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flexographic-technical-association.jpeg
Flexographic Technical Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Printing Industry
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Printing Industry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Flexographic Technical Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Printing Industry company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Flexographic Technical Association company.

In the current year, Printing Industry company and Flexographic Technical Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Printing Industry company nor Flexographic Technical Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Printing Industry company nor Flexographic Technical Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Printing Industry company nor Flexographic Technical Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association company nor Printing Industry company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association nor Printing Industry holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Flexographic Technical Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Printing Industry company.

Printing Industry company employs more people globally than Flexographic Technical Association company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association nor Printing Industry holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association nor Printing Industry holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association nor Printing Industry holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association nor Printing Industry holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association nor Printing Industry holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Flexographic Technical Association nor Printing Industry holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N