Comparison Overview

Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label

VS

Neyenesch Printers, Inc.

Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label

1110 E Pine Street, Seattle, 98122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Flexo Labels The flexographic printing process uses flexible plates that are highly economical and durable. Richmark Label has been producing product labeling and stickers using this process for decades. We have ten flexo presses, which are largely interchangeable. Almost all presses have ten stations, which mean they can print up to ten colors in a single run. While flexo presses require work to setup properly, they run at high speeds and are thus most economical of large print runs. Many of our presses are equipped with automatic registration control. This minimizes the setup time and maintains sharp color registration. Larger presses can handle larger label sizes or a greater number of labels printed across the the width of the stock materials. Flexo presses often use the four color process. This involves printing very small dots of four colors (cyan-blue, magenta, yellow and black) in the same way color magazines are printed. This process is also referred to as CMYK, after the names of the colors used. CMYK is particularly useful in printing artwork that involves photos. If printing CMYK, our flexo presses also can print up to six other colors or specialty inks or finishes. Such colors can be printed so the ink is far more smoothly distributed than in the CMYK process, which is excellent where there are larger areas of such colors on the label. Flexo presses can also be configured to use UV (ultraviolet) cured inks that provide a more protective finish. The ten stations available on the presses can be quickly adapted to foil stamping and demanding printing tasks all in one efficient press run. Flexo finishing with varnish or laminate as well as cutting to the desired shape and size can be handled in the same run, rather than as a separate process. Such finishing can also include foil and/or embossing where desired. Finally, the labels or stickers are wound into rolls or cut into sheets in accordance with the customer's requirements.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Neyenesch Printers, Inc.

2750 Kettner Blvd, San Diego, 92101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Simply put, we are printers. Started in 1899 and still family owned and operated, Neyenesch has spent the last century or so learning all there is to know about the art of printing. And we use this expertise daily. We use well-respected industry surveys of customer satisfaction. Our results have always scored in the top 10% of all printing companies in America. Our business has evolved to provide what our client’s covet most–expertise, attention to detail, variety of services, environmentally conscious practices, and competitive pricing. We believe that our satisfied clients and successful growth in our market and beyond speak volumes. But we invite you to read on about our approach to printing, and to contact us so that we can help make your printing project the best it can be.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flexographic-printing-at-richmark-label.jpeg
Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neyenesch-printers.jpeg
Neyenesch Printers, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Neyenesch Printers, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neyenesch Printers, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Neyenesch Printers, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neyenesch Printers, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flexographic-printing-at-richmark-label.jpeg
Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neyenesch-printers.jpeg
Neyenesch Printers, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company and Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company.

In the current year, Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company and Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company nor Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company nor Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company nor Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Neyenesch Printers, Inc. company.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Flexographic Printing by Richmark Label nor Neyenesch Printers, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N