Comparison Overview

FLEXIMARK

VS

Deimco Finishing Equipment

FLEXIMARK

Kungshagsvägen 9, Nyköping, Södermanland, SE, 611 35
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Fleximark is a company within LAPP. A family business and global player. We have warehouses all over the globe, development centres, 18 production sites, 44 sales companies and worldwide cooperation with business partners. Fleximark AB work actively and purposefully with quality, environmental and energy management. Fleximark is certified according to ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 50001. Fleximark is also certified by Achilles, and is a member of REPA. Our product range complies with the EU directive "RoHS" requirement. Products produced and delivered by Fleximark is also controlled under the EU REACH directive.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Deimco Finishing Equipment

1004 East 5th Street, Tama, Iowa, 52339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1983, Deimco is a US manufacturer that has provided American - made custom finishing equipment to industry for 30+ years. As a designer and manufacturer, we pride ourselves on developing application-specific engineered solutions to meet even your most demanding needs. Our customers'​ systems contain the latest technology and can be built to meet almost any application requirement.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fleximark.jpeg
FLEXIMARK
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deimco.jpeg
Deimco Finishing Equipment
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FLEXIMARK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Deimco Finishing Equipment
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLEXIMARK in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deimco Finishing Equipment in 2025.

Incident History — FLEXIMARK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLEXIMARK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Deimco Finishing Equipment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deimco Finishing Equipment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fleximark.jpeg
FLEXIMARK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deimco.jpeg
Deimco Finishing Equipment
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Deimco Finishing Equipment company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FLEXIMARK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Deimco Finishing Equipment company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FLEXIMARK company.

In the current year, Deimco Finishing Equipment company and FLEXIMARK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Deimco Finishing Equipment company nor FLEXIMARK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Deimco Finishing Equipment company nor FLEXIMARK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Deimco Finishing Equipment company nor FLEXIMARK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FLEXIMARK company nor Deimco Finishing Equipment company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FLEXIMARK nor Deimco Finishing Equipment holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FLEXIMARK company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Deimco Finishing Equipment company.

Deimco Finishing Equipment company employs more people globally than FLEXIMARK company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither FLEXIMARK nor Deimco Finishing Equipment holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FLEXIMARK nor Deimco Finishing Equipment holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FLEXIMARK nor Deimco Finishing Equipment holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FLEXIMARK nor Deimco Finishing Equipment holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FLEXIMARK nor Deimco Finishing Equipment holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FLEXIMARK nor Deimco Finishing Equipment holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H