Comparison Overview

FLB Group Limited

VS

Conquest Graphics

FLB Group Limited

EXCEL HOUSE (4TH FLOOR) 30 SEMPLE STREET, EDINBURGH, EH3 8BL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

FLB Group Ltd is now one of the world’s largest innovators and manufacturers of quality stationery and lifestyle accessories, with operations on three continents and distributors in more than 50 countries worldwide. All brands within the group have a long term authentic heritage and in most cases are the original innovators of their founding product category. We own the prestigious Filofax brand, Blueline and Letts of London, the world’s first commercial diary. The long established aim of the business is for our brands to be representative of the highest quality and the latest ideas to be found in the market. With the capability to conceptualise, produce and export worldwide, the purpose built, one of a kind manufacturing site in Dalkeith produces approximately 20 million units per annum. As well as manufacturing our own, we also produce private label products for a prestigious client base of UK retailers and offer commercial binding expertise to a large number of publishers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 86
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Conquest Graphics

3900-A Carolina Avenue, Richmond, 23222, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

We opened our doors as Lewis Printing Company in Richmond, Virginia on January 2, 1922. In just four years the business outgrew its space at 21 N.12th Street and moved to 1107 East Cary Street, where it stayed for about 40 years. In 1964, we moved into a larger, custom-built production facility at 900 W. Leigh Street, where we operated for 42 years. In 1990, we changed our name to Lewis Creative Technologies to reflect the changing times. In 1996, we once again opened new doors with an Internet website. In 2006, we moved into a spacious 90,000 square foot facility by Richmond International Raceway and changed our name to Conquest Graphics, and to better serve a growing national customer base, we expanded again to include additional operations, which allow us to provide faster service to West Coast clients. What you may not know about us is that we are one of the largest and oldest privately-held printing companies in the nation. We operate out of two modern, energy-efficient, and secure facilities with over 130,000 square feet of manufacturing space. Today, as a fourth-generation, family business, through the leadership of President, Chris Lewis, we are continuing to grow and make significant leaps and investments in the deployment of technologies that serve our traditional print and digital communications clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flb-group-limited.jpeg
FLB Group Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conquest-graphics.jpeg
Conquest Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FLB Group Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conquest Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FLB Group Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conquest Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — FLB Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FLB Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conquest Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conquest Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flb-group-limited.jpeg
FLB Group Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conquest-graphics.jpeg
Conquest Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both FLB Group Limited company and Conquest Graphics company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Conquest Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to FLB Group Limited company.

In the current year, Conquest Graphics company and FLB Group Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor FLB Group Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor FLB Group Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Conquest Graphics company nor FLB Group Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither FLB Group Limited company nor Conquest Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither FLB Group Limited nor Conquest Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither FLB Group Limited company nor Conquest Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

FLB Group Limited company employs more people globally than Conquest Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither FLB Group Limited nor Conquest Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither FLB Group Limited nor Conquest Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither FLB Group Limited nor Conquest Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither FLB Group Limited nor Conquest Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither FLB Group Limited nor Conquest Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither FLB Group Limited nor Conquest Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N