Comparison Overview

Flashpoint at Georgia Tech

VS

Project on Indigenous Governance and Development

Flashpoint at Georgia Tech

828 West Peachtree Street NW, Atlanta, 30308, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

Flashpoint creates better startups, faster. Operating since 2011, Flashpoint is among the most experienced startup studios in the world. It is unique in teaching the Deliberate Innovation approach. Flashpoint startups have raised over $300 million from top-tier venture firms. The companies in Flashpoint’s portfolio are valued at well over $1.4 billion. We welcome committed founders with domain knowledge and a passion for responding to the needs of their customers, and help them shape startups with true market/product fit, reduced risks, lower costs, and a better chance of high quality success. Flashpoint is not an incubator or accelerator; it is a rigorous management and education program that works closely with founders to create companies. .

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Project on Indigenous Governance and Development

124 Mount Auburn St, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, 02138
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The Project on Indigenous Governance and Development at the Harvard Kennedy School is the recognized leader in practical research, teaching, leadership development, policy analysis, and pro bono advising for Native communities. With Indigenous peoples so long shut out from access to world-class and relevant educational and economic opportunities, the core mission of the Project is to arm Indigenous people themselves with the tools needed to govern effectively and to strengthen their economic, social, and cultural fabrics. These nations are being rebuilt, poverty is being pushed back, and cultures are being strengthened as Indian communities take charge of their own destinies. Based at the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, the Project focuses on what works to strengthen Indigenous communities—and what doesn’t work. Since 1987, the Project has worked to uncover and support the conditions under which sustained, self-determined political, social, cultural, and economic strengthening can be achieved by Indigenous communities. The Project has been awarded by tribes themselves for its pioneering work fostering the Indigenous renaissance that has taken hold in the US and beyond.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flashpoint-at-georgia-tech.jpeg
Flashpoint at Georgia Tech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigenous-gov.jpeg
Project on Indigenous Governance and Development
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Flashpoint at Georgia Tech
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Project on Indigenous Governance and Development
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Flashpoint at Georgia Tech in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Project on Indigenous Governance and Development in 2025.

Incident History — Flashpoint at Georgia Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Flashpoint at Georgia Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Project on Indigenous Governance and Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Project on Indigenous Governance and Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/flashpoint-at-georgia-tech.jpeg
Flashpoint at Georgia Tech
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indigenous-gov.jpeg
Project on Indigenous Governance and Development
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company and Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company.

In the current year, Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company and Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company nor Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company nor Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company nor Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Flashpoint at Georgia Tech company employs more people globally than Project on Indigenous Governance and Development company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Flashpoint at Georgia Tech nor Project on Indigenous Governance and Development holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X