Comparison Overview

Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP

VS

Gerson Branco Advogados

Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP

Charter Court, Newcomen Way, Colchester, Essex, CO4 9YA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

FJG is the Essex law firm with deep-rooted ethical values and cast-iron integrity, committed to providing expert legal advice and exceptional client service. FJG’s ethos is to work hard every day to make FJG the preferred choice for anyone requiring legal advice from a law firm with a conscience. Respected by clients and peers alike, FJG are committed to giving back to the locality in which we work, truly wanting to make a difference for you, your business and our shared communities. Together, our employees are driven by a desire to build a law firm for future generations where clients continue to receive outstanding legal advice from a firm with strong ethics and approachable staff. We also pride ourselves on being a vibrant, innovative and tech nimble firm, embracing new ways of working to enhance our clients’ entire experience of legal services. However, you can rest assured that with more than 40 years’ experience, FJG remains current in our thoughts and actions but a trusted, established firm. Our expertise is backed up by accreditations and awards, with rankings in both the Legal500 and Chambers directories across several areas. We have also held the Lexcel Law Society quality mark, for over 15 years consecutively. You can trust FJG’s 150 legal experts and support staff to be authoritatively reassuring, plain speaking and knowledgeable finding efficient and practical ways to help across a wide range of areas. Whether it’s company and commercial, family law, wills or conveyancing, FJG is the right choice for you, your family and your business.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 148
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gerson Branco Advogados

Av. Carlos Gomes n. 651, Porto Alegre, 90480-003, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-28

O Gerson Branco Advogados reúne profissionais em torno de uma mesma crença: a fidelização de clientes promovendo soluções jurídicas personalizadas no Direito Empresarial. Há mais de 20 anos trabalhando juntos, priorizamos a construção de relações sólidas com nossos clientes, enquanto mantemos a constante especialização de nossa equipe. Nosso time de profissionais é composto por advogados experientes e jovens, atuando tanto no consultivo quanto no contencioso. A partir da união dos perfis acadêmico e criativo mantemos a busca constante por soluções eficientes e adequadas para cada situação. Guiados pelo objetivo de agregar valor às estruturas empresariais, prestamos assessoria jurídica visando otimizar as tomadas de decisões e os resultados financeiros dos clientes. Seguindo essa filosofia, construímos uma trajetória de resolução de problemas jurídico-empresariais de alta complexidade. Entre os temas que compõem o cotidiano de nossos profissionais, estão: operações de fusão e aquisição em quadros regulatórios adversos, litígios societários, discussões tributárias de valores consideráveis, desenvolvimento de contratos complexos, transferência de controle de instituições financeiras, recuperações judiciais de empresas que atuem, ou não, em mercado regulado, assessoria para implementação de investimentos estrangeiros.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fjgsolicitors.jpeg
Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gerson-branco-advogados.jpeg
Gerson Branco Advogados
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gerson Branco Advogados
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gerson Branco Advogados in 2025.

Incident History — Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gerson Branco Advogados (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gerson Branco Advogados cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fjgsolicitors.jpeg
Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gerson-branco-advogados.jpeg
Gerson Branco Advogados
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gerson Branco Advogados company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gerson Branco Advogados company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company.

In the current year, Gerson Branco Advogados company and Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gerson Branco Advogados company nor Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gerson Branco Advogados company nor Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gerson Branco Advogados company nor Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company nor Gerson Branco Advogados company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP nor Gerson Branco Advogados holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gerson Branco Advogados company.

Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP company employs more people globally than Gerson Branco Advogados company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP nor Gerson Branco Advogados holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP nor Gerson Branco Advogados holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP nor Gerson Branco Advogados holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP nor Gerson Branco Advogados holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP nor Gerson Branco Advogados holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fisher Jones Greenwood LLP nor Gerson Branco Advogados holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X