Comparison Overview

fivefourstudios

VS

Food Photographer Pty Ltd

fivefourstudios

54 Oldfield Road, Manchester, M5 4JZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 700 and 749

fivefourstudios, a 1970’s warehouse transformed into a state of the photographic studio and event space. The building has been renovated and reopened by David Oldham, a world-famous fashion and beauty photographer and Emma Stamp, who brings over twenty years fashion retail and hospitality management to the business. David’s aspiration was to create the perfect photographic studio both in a practical and aesthetic sense, and it is his style and attention to detail which has made this a reality. Restoring much of the original industrial features and adding a touch of decadence, the result is an elegant mix of styles from the scandi-minimalism of the loft to the opulence of the bar and lounge. The unique venue set over three floors consists of three pure white studios, one full daylight studio and two with infinity coves, a bar and lounge. The studios have served a number of high-end clients, including Manchester United and Manchester City football clubs, Morrisons, Footasylum, New Balance, Team GB, Oxfam, NSPCC, Metrolink and Adidas, and the fivefourteam are now turning their creative skill, operational expertise and excellent client service to events.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Food Photographer Pty Ltd

Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000
Last Update: 2025-12-15

Home to Brent Parker jones, a specialist food photographer and an authentically passionate food professional. Over the years working in this space, Brent has built a unique food photography studio, equipped with a commercial kitchen and one of Melbourne’s largest collections of food prop libraries. Brent and his seasoned team of specialists will seamlessly integrate with your existing marketing team, creating a smooth and efficient environment that delivers on all your brand's visual requirements."

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fivefourstudios.jpeg
fivefourstudios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/food-photographer-pty-ltd.jpeg
Food Photographer Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
fivefourstudios
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Food Photographer Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for fivefourstudios in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Food Photographer Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — fivefourstudios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

fivefourstudios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Food Photographer Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Food Photographer Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fivefourstudios.jpeg
fivefourstudios
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/food-photographer-pty-ltd.jpeg
Food Photographer Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both fivefourstudios company and Food Photographer Pty Ltd company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Food Photographer Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to fivefourstudios company.

In the current year, Food Photographer Pty Ltd company and fivefourstudios company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Food Photographer Pty Ltd company nor fivefourstudios company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Food Photographer Pty Ltd company nor fivefourstudios company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Food Photographer Pty Ltd company nor fivefourstudios company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither fivefourstudios company nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither fivefourstudios nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither fivefourstudios company nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

fivefourstudios company employs more people globally than Food Photographer Pty Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither fivefourstudios nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither fivefourstudios nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither fivefourstudios nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither fivefourstudios nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither fivefourstudios nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither fivefourstudios nor Food Photographer Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N