Comparison Overview

Fitzgerald Technology Group

VS

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics

Fitzgerald Technology Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02

With over 25 years of experience Fitzgerald Technology Group has provided unsurpassed consulting services to governments and clients around the globe. Our staff possesses the highest levels of security credentials serving as faculty members, guest lecturers and educational program developers for colleges and universities, along with serving as board members, council leaders, senior instructors and subject matter experts for associations, societies and agencies. Our executives serve on working groups and committees currently developing new international security standards and guidelines, which is a testament to our level of expertise. With multiple board certifications in Security Management, Threat Analysis, Vulnerability Assessments, Countermeasures Design and Organizational Resilience our teams are internationally recognized and have extensive knowledge and expertise in the areas of High Risk and Special Operations, Penetration Exercises, Standard and Emergency Policy Development, Tactical Response and Command / Control / Communications. Our mission is to utilize the most advanced technology and elite expertise to respond to any level of security risk anywhere in the world.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics

31 Beaumont St, Oxford, undefined, OX1 2NP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We bridge the interface of theology, economics and business in promoting an enterprise economy built on solid ethical foundations. The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and Ethics (CEME) seeks to address some of the challenges facing 21st Century capitalism. The repercussions of the financial crisis of 2007 were far-reaching and led to the loss of a broadly accepted ethical framework. Indeed confidence has been dented in the entire system of private enterprise, capitalism and an enterprise-based economy. CEME works to articulate a vision for an enterprise economy underpinned by a Judeo-Christian framework. We want to win the argument for both enterprise and morality. We achieve our purposes through events, research and publications. We aim to influence opinion formers and leaders and equip those in business to think through the issues. We think deeply and act globally. We have particular interests in: – The moral basis of wealth creation – Profit, taxation and enterprise – Vocation to business – Philanthropy and social welfare – Ethical challenges Our approach combines high academic excellence in theology, business and economics, with a direct engagement with the business community designed to promote sound ethical behaviour and the wider aims of the common good and the relief of poverty.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-technology-group.jpeg
Fitzgerald Technology Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-centre-for-enterprise-markets-and-ethics.jpeg
The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fitzgerald Technology Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitzgerald Technology Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics in 2025.

Incident History — Fitzgerald Technology Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitzgerald Technology Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-technology-group.jpeg
Fitzgerald Technology Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-centre-for-enterprise-markets-and-ethics.jpeg
The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fitzgerald Technology Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fitzgerald Technology Group company.

In the current year, The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company and Fitzgerald Technology Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group company nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group company nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company employs more people globally than Fitzgerald Technology Group company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X