Comparison Overview

Fitzgerald Technology Group

VS

The British Blockchain Association

Fitzgerald Technology Group

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fitzgeraldtechnologygroup.com

With over 25 years of experience Fitzgerald Technology Group has provided unsurpassed consulting services to governments and clients around the globe. Our staff possesses the highest levels of security credentials serving as faculty members, guest lecturers and educational program developers for colleges and universities, along with serving as board members, council leaders, senior instructors and subject matter experts for associations, societies and agencies. Our executives serve on working groups and committees currently developing new international security standards and guidelines, which is a testament to our level of expertise. With multiple board certifications in Security Management, Threat Analysis, Vulnerability Assessments, Countermeasures Design and Organizational Resilience our teams are internationally recognized and have extensive knowledge and expertise in the areas of High Risk and Special Operations, Penetration Exercises, Standard and Emergency Policy Development, Tactical Response and Command / Control / Communications. Our mission is to utilize the most advanced technology and elite expertise to respond to any level of security risk anywhere in the world.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The British Blockchain Association

152 - 160 City Road , London, EC1V 2NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
https://www.britishblockchainassociation.org/

BBA published the UK's National Blockchain Roadmap in July 2021: https://britishblockchainassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/UK-NBR-Excellence-Standards-Framework.pdf BBA is one of the world’s most prestigious and most influential voices on Blockchain. Established in 2017, BBA is a not-for-profit organisation that promotes Evidence-Based adoption of Blockchain and other Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) across the public and private sectors. The BBA is an advocate for both industry and academia. It is the leading global association for blockchain technologies with extensive network presence in 6 continents. BBA is home to the Journal of British Blockchain Association (JBBA), the world’s first peer-reviewed research journal on Blockchain and DLT ecosystems that is available both in print and online. BBA hosts the Centre for Evidence-Based Blockchain (CEBB), the world's first neutral, decentralised, global coalition of some of the world's leading research universities and academic institutions, advising policymakers, governments and BBA member organisations. The BBA is also home to Blockchain International Scientific Conferences (ISCs) and BBA Student Forum is the Student wing of the BBA and is responsible for the voice of Blockchain within Academia. The BBA connects policymakers, blockchain engineers, venture capitalists and visionaries to advance the understanding, acceptance and application of blockchain/DLT technologies. The BBA has advisors and members in 6 continents, and an Editorial Board that comprises of world's most renowned academics in over 79 countries, including 15 US States. BBA is working in collaboration with: The United Nations, The BBC, Dept. for International Trade, British Embassies, HM Treasury, UK Crypto Asset Task Force, UK APPG and several enterprise blockchain organisations.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-technology-group.jpeg
Fitzgerald Technology Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/britishblockchain.jpeg
The British Blockchain Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fitzgerald Technology Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The British Blockchain Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitzgerald Technology Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The British Blockchain Association in 2025.

Incident History — Fitzgerald Technology Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitzgerald Technology Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The British Blockchain Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The British Blockchain Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-technology-group.jpeg
Fitzgerald Technology Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/britishblockchain.jpeg
The British Blockchain Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fitzgerald Technology Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The British Blockchain Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The British Blockchain Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fitzgerald Technology Group company.

In the current year, The British Blockchain Association company and Fitzgerald Technology Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The British Blockchain Association company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The British Blockchain Association company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The British Blockchain Association company nor Fitzgerald Technology Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group company nor The British Blockchain Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The British Blockchain Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The British Blockchain Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fitzgerald Technology Group company.

The British Blockchain Association company employs more people globally than Fitzgerald Technology Group company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The British Blockchain Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The British Blockchain Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The British Blockchain Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The British Blockchain Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The British Blockchain Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Technology Group nor The British Blockchain Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References