Comparison Overview

Fitzgerald Photo Imaging

VS

Kramer Photography

Fitzgerald Photo Imaging

350 Fitzgerald Street, North Perth, 6006, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Fitzgerald Photo Labs is a family owned and operated business. Established more than 30 years ago, the business began as a professional photographic studio offering wedding and portrait photography. With state of the art machines, cutting edge technology and up to date education, Fitzgerald's remains one of Australia's market leaders in providing you with the widest choice in service selection.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kramer Photography

3157 Illawarra Highway, Macquarie Pass, NSW, 2527, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-12

A dynamic duo of content creators with a passion for capturing stills and video from air, ground, and water. Kramer Photography have extensive experience working with clients in the private and not for profit sectors, and recognise the importance of being able to understand and satisfy the unique requirements of each project. In addition to our extensive existing image collection, Kramer Photography are able to capture new content specific to the clients brief. Our expertise and equipment allows us to specialise in a wide range of photographic styles including landscape, aerial, abstract, macro and fine art photography. All Kramer Photography artworks are Made in Australia. Our in-house digital print lab and framing studio ensure we can customise products to suit a given budget, and are able to work to tight deadlines.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-photo-imaging.jpeg
Fitzgerald Photo Imaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dee-kramer-photography.jpeg
Kramer Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fitzgerald Photo Imaging
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kramer Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitzgerald Photo Imaging in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kramer Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Fitzgerald Photo Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitzgerald Photo Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kramer Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kramer Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzgerald-photo-imaging.jpeg
Fitzgerald Photo Imaging
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dee-kramer-photography.jpeg
Kramer Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kramer Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kramer Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company.

In the current year, Kramer Photography company and Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kramer Photography company nor Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kramer Photography company nor Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kramer Photography company nor Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company nor Kramer Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging nor Kramer Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kramer Photography company.

Fitzgerald Photo Imaging company employs more people globally than Kramer Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging nor Kramer Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging nor Kramer Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging nor Kramer Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging nor Kramer Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging nor Kramer Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fitzgerald Photo Imaging nor Kramer Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N