Comparison Overview

Fitness Wear, inc

VS

Mountain Dog Sign Company

Fitness Wear, inc

1940B Lehigh Ave., Glenview, Illinois, 60026, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Fitness Wear has been providing Chicago with quality screen printing for over 30 years. With our passion and expertise in custom clothing, Fitness Wear pledges satisfaction to every customer. There is no job too small or complex for us. Fitness Wear loves bringing anyone's custom screen printing ideas to life. Contact us with any questions or inquiries. (847)486-1704 [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mountain Dog Sign Company

1620 N Mamer RD Suite D100, Spokane Valley, WA, US, 99216
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Mountain Dog Sign Company is a minority, woman-owned custom sign manufacturer, established in 2011, serving the Northwest and beyond. We specialize in ADA compliant braille, architectural sign and art finishes, graphics, vinyl, interior and exterior projects for clients large and small. Our in-house design and production teams ensure satisfaction with everything from a logo design to entire building signage. With Mountain Dog Sign Company you will always find quality, care and dedication to all your signage projects.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-wear-inc.jpeg
Fitness Wear, inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-dog-sign-company.jpeg
Mountain Dog Sign Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fitness Wear, inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mountain Dog Sign Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitness Wear, inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mountain Dog Sign Company in 2025.

Incident History — Fitness Wear, inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitness Wear, inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mountain Dog Sign Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mountain Dog Sign Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-wear-inc.jpeg
Fitness Wear, inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mountain-dog-sign-company.jpeg
Mountain Dog Sign Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Fitness Wear, inc company and Mountain Dog Sign Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mountain Dog Sign Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fitness Wear, inc company.

In the current year, Mountain Dog Sign Company company and Fitness Wear, inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mountain Dog Sign Company company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc company nor Mountain Dog Sign Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Mountain Dog Sign Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc company nor Mountain Dog Sign Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mountain Dog Sign Company company employs more people globally than Fitness Wear, inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Mountain Dog Sign Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Mountain Dog Sign Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Mountain Dog Sign Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Mountain Dog Sign Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Mountain Dog Sign Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Mountain Dog Sign Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N