Comparison Overview

Fitness Wear, inc

VS

Kingston Printing

Fitness Wear, inc

1940B Lehigh Ave., Glenview, Illinois, 60026, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Fitness Wear has been providing Chicago with quality screen printing for over 30 years. With our passion and expertise in custom clothing, Fitness Wear pledges satisfaction to every customer. There is no job too small or complex for us. Fitness Wear loves bringing anyone's custom screen printing ideas to life. Contact us with any questions or inquiries. (847)486-1704 [email protected]

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kingston Printing

1030 OCL Parkway, Eudora, KS, 66025, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Kingston Printing is a premiere, independent commercial printer. Since it’s inception in 1987, the company has grown from a two-color duplicator shop to a cutting edge, full-service commercial printing and graphics provider. Kingston’s success is due in large part to recruiting and hiring talented associates who understand the company’s commitment to excellence through consistency, quality and customer service. Kingston currently employs about 40 associates headquartered in our Eudora, KS based 40,000 square foot facility.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-wear-inc.jpeg
Fitness Wear, inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingston-printing.jpeg
Kingston Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fitness Wear, inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kingston Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitness Wear, inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kingston Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Fitness Wear, inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitness Wear, inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kingston Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kingston Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-wear-inc.jpeg
Fitness Wear, inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingston-printing.jpeg
Kingston Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Fitness Wear, inc company and Kingston Printing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Kingston Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fitness Wear, inc company.

In the current year, Kingston Printing company and Fitness Wear, inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kingston Printing company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kingston Printing company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kingston Printing company nor Fitness Wear, inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc company nor Kingston Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Kingston Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc company nor Kingston Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kingston Printing company employs more people globally than Fitness Wear, inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Kingston Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Kingston Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Kingston Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Kingston Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Kingston Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fitness Wear, inc nor Kingston Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N