Comparison Overview

Fitness Depot

VS

Smart Fit

Fitness Depot

CA, K6H5V7
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Canadas Largest Specialty Fitness Retailer with 40 stores nationwide. We carry simply the best Brands and Products at every Price Point Premier Cardio brands include Precor, Octane, Pacemaster, Bremshey. Strength brands include Torque Fitness and Northern Lights

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Smart Fit

Avenida Paulista 1294, São Paulo, undefined, undefined, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Somos a maior rede de academias da América Latina, com o propósito de democratizar o fitness de alto padrão. Estamos presentes em 15 países, contando com mais de 1500 academias. Atendemos mais de 4 milhões de alunos e contamos com nossa gente de mais de 7 mil colaboradores dedicados, empenhados em oferecer inovação constante.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11,468
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-depot.jpeg
Fitness Depot
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-fit.jpeg
Smart Fit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fitness Depot
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smart Fit
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitness Depot in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Fit in 2025.

Incident History — Fitness Depot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitness Depot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smart Fit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Fit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-depot.jpeg
Fitness Depot
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Web Skimming (e-skimming)
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-fit.jpeg
Smart Fit
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Smart Fit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fitness Depot company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fitness Depot company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Smart Fit company has not reported any.

In the current year, Smart Fit company and Fitness Depot company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smart Fit company nor Fitness Depot company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fitness Depot company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Smart Fit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Smart Fit company nor Fitness Depot company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fitness Depot company nor Smart Fit company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fitness Depot nor Smart Fit holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Smart Fit company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fitness Depot company.

Smart Fit company employs more people globally than Fitness Depot company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither Fitness Depot nor Smart Fit holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor Smart Fit holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor Smart Fit holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor Smart Fit holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor Smart Fit holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor Smart Fit holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N