Comparison Overview

Fitness Depot

VS

LA Fitness

Fitness Depot

CA, K6H5V7
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

Canadas Largest Specialty Fitness Retailer with 40 stores nationwide. We carry simply the best Brands and Products at every Price Point Premier Cardio brands include Precor, Octane, Pacemaster, Bremshey. Strength brands include Torque Fitness and Northern Lights

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 76
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

LA Fitness

PO Box 55088, Irvine, California, 92619, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

LA Fitness is a privately owned fitness club chain. LA Fitness has hundreds of health clubs gyms and millions of members across US and Canada. In an industry often equated with fad and fashion, LA Fitness has steadily increased its presence by focusing on the one lifelong benefit valued by everyone: good health. Established in Southern California in 1984, LA Fitness continues to seek innovative ways to enhance the wellbeing of its members. Today, LA Fitness’ state-of-the-art clubs span the continent and continue to expand. LA Fitness’ strong and successful growth stems from its commitment to understanding and meeting the distinct needs of each community it serves. With a wide range of amenities and a highly trained staff, LA Fitness can provide fun and effective workout options to family members of all ages and interests. Website - http://www.lafitness.com Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/LAFitness Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/LAFitness Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+lafitness YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/lafitness

NAICS: 71394
NAICS Definition: Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees: 14,288
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-depot.jpeg
Fitness Depot
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fitness Depot
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LA Fitness
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitness Depot in 2025.

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LA Fitness in 2025.

Incident History — Fitness Depot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitness Depot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LA Fitness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LA Fitness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitness-depot.jpeg
Fitness Depot
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Web Skimming (e-skimming)
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/la-fitness.jpeg
LA Fitness
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LA Fitness company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fitness Depot company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fitness Depot company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LA Fitness company has not reported any.

In the current year, LA Fitness company and Fitness Depot company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LA Fitness company nor Fitness Depot company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fitness Depot company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other LA Fitness company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LA Fitness company nor Fitness Depot company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fitness Depot company nor LA Fitness company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fitness Depot nor LA Fitness holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fitness Depot company nor LA Fitness company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LA Fitness company employs more people globally than Fitness Depot company, reflecting its scale as a Wellness and Fitness Services.

Neither Fitness Depot nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor LA Fitness holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor LA Fitness holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor LA Fitness holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor LA Fitness holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fitness Depot nor LA Fitness holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N