Comparison Overview

First Republic Private Wealth Management

VS

ICE

First Republic Private Wealth Management

None, None, None, None, US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.firstrepublic.com/

First Republic is now part of JPMorgan Chase. Our commitment to provide extraordinary client service has not changed. Our mission continues to be understanding your individual needs and responding with personalized solutions. Our service model is now backed by the strength and stability of JPMorgan Chase, an institution that has been a leader in financial services for more than 200 years. See full social media terms and conditions at chase.com/socialterms.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

ICE

Atlanta, GA, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ice.com

ICE (NYSE: ICE) connects people to data, technology and expertise that create opportunity and inspire innovation. For terms of use, visit www.ice.com/privacy-security-center/terms-of-use

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11,585
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firstrepublic.jpeg
First Republic Private Wealth Management
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icemarkets.jpeg
ICE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
First Republic Private Wealth Management
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Republic Private Wealth Management in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICE in 2026.

Incident History — First Republic Private Wealth Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Republic Private Wealth Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firstrepublic.jpeg
First Republic Private Wealth Management
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2012
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Improper Data Disposal
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icemarkets.jpeg
ICE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ICE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to First Republic Private Wealth Management company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

First Republic Private Wealth Management company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ICE company has not reported any.

In the current year, ICE company and First Republic Private Wealth Management company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICE company nor First Republic Private Wealth Management company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

First Republic Private Wealth Management company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other ICE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ICE company nor First Republic Private Wealth Management company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management company nor ICE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management nor ICE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ICE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to First Republic Private Wealth Management company.

ICE company employs more people globally than First Republic Private Wealth Management company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management nor ICE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management nor ICE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management nor ICE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management nor ICE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management nor ICE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither First Republic Private Wealth Management nor ICE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References