Comparison Overview

First State Conveyancing

VS

Legally

First State Conveyancing

2/225 Victoria Street, TAREE, 2430, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

First State Conveyancing specialises in Conveyancing. It is all we do. We have offices in Taree, Forster, Cessnock, Newcastle and on the Central Coast at Gorokan. Generally, conveyancing is the process involved in the transfer of title of property to another person if you are selling or from another person if you are buying. Specifically, conveyancing can involve the transfer of ownership of real estate or personal property such as businesses. Your First State Conveyancer can also prepare or advise on mortgages and leases. That's not all. Your First State Conveyancer can advise on your eligibility for Government grants such as the First Home Owners Grant Scheme and First Home Plus Scheme. We can prepare Powers Of Attorney and we can also assist in the preparation of Easements and Covenants. First State Conveyancing offers a "Flat Cost"​ for all of your Conveyancing requirements. We do not charge extra for "sundry"​ items such as post, fax or telephone costs, and you do not need to engage a solicitor when using our firm. If you need a Conveyancer, you need First State Conveyancing. Our First State Conveyancers are your Conveyancing Specialists.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legally

Tel Aviv, IL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Legally transforms legalese to plain language so that everyone can understand the contracts they’re signing. By combining real lawyers and cutting-edge AI technology, we’ve created a fixed-price marketplace that provides contract reviews for everyday legal documents. Legally brings the legal world to the public by offering an affordable, fast, and accurate solution.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/first-state-conveyancing.jpeg
First State Conveyancing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legally.jpeg
Legally
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
First State Conveyancing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legally
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First State Conveyancing in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legally in 2025.

Incident History — First State Conveyancing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First State Conveyancing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legally (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legally cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/first-state-conveyancing.jpeg
First State Conveyancing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legally.jpeg
Legally
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Legally company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to First State Conveyancing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Legally company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to First State Conveyancing company.

In the current year, Legally company and First State Conveyancing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legally company nor First State Conveyancing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legally company nor First State Conveyancing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legally company nor First State Conveyancing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither First State Conveyancing company nor Legally company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither First State Conveyancing nor Legally holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither First State Conveyancing company nor Legally company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

First State Conveyancing company employs more people globally than Legally company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither First State Conveyancing nor Legally holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither First State Conveyancing nor Legally holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither First State Conveyancing nor Legally holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither First State Conveyancing nor Legally holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither First State Conveyancing nor Legally holds HIPAA certification.

Neither First State Conveyancing nor Legally holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X