Comparison Overview

First Republic

VS

Fidelity Investments

First Republic

111 Pine St, San Francisco, 94111, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.firstrepublic.com

First Republic is now part of JPMorgan Chase. Our commitment to provide extraordinary client service has not changed. Our mission continues to be understanding your individual needs and responding with personalized solutions. Our service model is now backed by the strength and stability of JPMorgan Chase, an institution that has been a leader in financial services for more than 200 years. Website: www.firstrepublic.com See full social media terms and conditions at chase.com/socialterms.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 1,513
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Fidelity Investments

245 Summer St, Boston, MA, US, 02210
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fidelity.com

Fidelity’s mission is to strengthen the financial well-being of our customers and deliver better outcomes for the clients and businesses we serve. Fidelity’s strength comes from the scale of our diversified, market-leading financial services businesses that serve individuals, families, employers, wealth management firms, and institutions. With assets under administration of $15.0 trillion, including discretionary assets of $5.9 trillion as of March 31, 2025, we focus on meeting the unique needs of a broad and growing customer base. Privately held for 78 years, Fidelity employs more than 77,000 associates across the United States, Ireland, and India. For our Terms and Conditions, please visit http://go.fidelity.com/LIterms

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 84,396
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/first-republic.jpeg
First Republic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-investments.jpeg
Fidelity Investments
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
First Republic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fidelity Investments
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Republic in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fidelity Investments in 2026.

Incident History — First Republic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Republic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fidelity Investments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fidelity Investments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/first-republic.jpeg
First Republic
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2012
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fidelity-investments.jpeg
Fidelity Investments
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Third-party software vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2014
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fidelity Investments company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to First Republic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fidelity Investments company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to First Republic company.

In the current year, Fidelity Investments company and First Republic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fidelity Investments company nor First Republic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Fidelity Investments company and First Republic company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Fidelity Investments company nor First Republic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Fidelity Investments company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while First Republic company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither First Republic nor Fidelity Investments holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fidelity Investments company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to First Republic company.

Fidelity Investments company employs more people globally than First Republic company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither First Republic nor Fidelity Investments holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither First Republic nor Fidelity Investments holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither First Republic nor Fidelity Investments holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither First Republic nor Fidelity Investments holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither First Republic nor Fidelity Investments holds HIPAA certification.

Neither First Republic nor Fidelity Investments holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References