Comparison Overview

First Class Legal Pty Ltd

VS

Invention Mine, LLC

First Class Legal Pty Ltd

459 Collins St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

First Class Legal is a legal firm which focusses primarily on conveyancing. We are a leader in (electronic) conveyancing. We take the stress out of property transactions. We were the first incorporated legal practice in Melbourne to effect an electronic settlement (April 2015), one of the first to prepare an electronically-signed Section 32 (June 2015), the first legal firm in Victoria to prepare an electronically signed residential auction Contract of Sale (September 2016) and the first legal firm in Victoria to facilitate a fully paperless end to end electronic conveyance (January 2017). In August 2018, we became the first legal or conveyancing firm in Australia to electronically lodge 1,000 Transfers. Our energetic and highly skilled team comprises solicitors and para-legals. We pride ourselves on professional and personal service with high levels of proactive communication. First Class Legal has offices in the Melbourne CBD, Blackburn, Frankston and Greensborough and we service all of Victoria. We also have offices on the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast. For peace of mind buying and selling, call or email us - 1300 956 321 or [email protected]

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Invention Mine, LLC

200 S. Wacker, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

A full-service intellectual property law firm. At Invention Mine LLC, our professionals help you uncover and refine your intellectual property to extract the maximum value. The Invention Mine team is made up of engineers-turned-lawyers having meaningful industry experience and top-notch academic credentials. We form strategic partnerships with our clients. When you engage Invention Mine, you get a partner who is interested in your technology, your business, and your success.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invention-mine-llc.jpeg
Invention Mine, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
First Class Legal Pty Ltd
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Invention Mine, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for First Class Legal Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Invention Mine, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — First Class Legal Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

First Class Legal Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Invention Mine, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Invention Mine, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/first-class-conveyancing.jpeg
First Class Legal Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invention-mine-llc.jpeg
Invention Mine, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both First Class Legal Pty Ltd company and Invention Mine, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Invention Mine, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to First Class Legal Pty Ltd company.

In the current year, Invention Mine, LLC company and First Class Legal Pty Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Invention Mine, LLC company nor First Class Legal Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Invention Mine, LLC company nor First Class Legal Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Invention Mine, LLC company nor First Class Legal Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd company nor Invention Mine, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd nor Invention Mine, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd company nor Invention Mine, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

First Class Legal Pty Ltd company employs more people globally than Invention Mine, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd nor Invention Mine, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd nor Invention Mine, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd nor Invention Mine, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd nor Invention Mine, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd nor Invention Mine, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither First Class Legal Pty Ltd nor Invention Mine, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X