Comparison Overview

Firehouse Image Center

VS

Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc.

Firehouse Image Center

2000 North Illinois Street, Indianapolis, IN, US, 46202
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.firehouseimagecenter.com

For over 45 years, Firehouse has provided powerful print solutions to our clients by producing visual marketing, event, indoor and outdoor graphics. Firehouse offers a wide variety of print options to meet your specific need: Large-format UV Large-format Latex Large-format Dye Sub Lambda Photographic Prints HP Indigo Digital Press Packsize on-demand packaging system Die cutting, mailings, mounting & lamination, fulfillment

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc.

2302 Air Park Drive , Burlington, North Carolina, 27215, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lti-us.com

Welcome to Labels, Tags, & Inserts Inc. At LTI, we’re not just another printer, we’re your partners – and we have been for more than two decades. Our clients run the gamut of modern commerce – from consumer products to food and beverage, from health and beauty to apparel – and everything in between. What keeps them coming back to LTI? Our team of print and design experts listens to you. We ask about and understand your needs and goals, making personalized recommendations to help your product stand out on the retail shelf. LTI’s extensive lineup of cutting-edge flexographic equipment ensures your project is the best it can be. We can guarantee exceptional quality, minimal waste and maximum savings – all with the quickest turnaround possible. From the minute you meet with your dedicated LTI team, you’ll understand why we say: It’s your brand, but it’s our priority.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firehouse-image-center.jpeg
Firehouse Image Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labels-tags-&-inserts-inc-.jpeg
Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Firehouse Image Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Firehouse Image Center in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Firehouse Image Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Firehouse Image Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firehouse-image-center.jpeg
Firehouse Image Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/labels-tags-&-inserts-inc-.jpeg
Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Firehouse Image Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Firehouse Image Center company.

In the current year, Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company and Firehouse Image Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company nor Firehouse Image Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company nor Firehouse Image Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company nor Firehouse Image Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Firehouse Image Center company nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Firehouse Image Center nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Firehouse Image Center company nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Firehouse Image Center company employs more people globally than Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Firehouse Image Center nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Firehouse Image Center nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Firehouse Image Center nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Firehouse Image Center nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Firehouse Image Center nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Firehouse Image Center nor Labels, Tags & Inserts, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References