Comparison Overview

Firearms Legal Protection

VS

Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC

Firearms Legal Protection

15301 Dallas Pkwy, Addison, 75001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Firearms Legal Protection provides members with 100% payment for attorney fees when a weapon is used lawfully for self-defense in protection of yourself and family. Backed by our vast network of experienced attorneys, our members are equipped with service and support for every second following a self-defensive, firearm incident. We protect those who protect themselves.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC

411 Theodore Fremd Ave, Rye, New York, 10580, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC is a New York-based firm which since 1993 has handled international and interstate litigation throughout the United States at the most sophisticated levels, with an emphasis on large, complex commercial transportation and insurance litigation. The name partners (one of whom is deceased) played roles in such headline making cases as “The Pentagon Papers” case, the U.S. Steel/Marathon Oil tender offer litigation, the MV Elma Tres ship sinking/mass catastrophe and the Sompo train derailment litigations, up to the U.S. Supreme Court. The firm has received Martindale-Hubbel’s highest rating for skill and integrity, among many other awards. The firm routinely handles such matters throughout the United States (including numerous cases in the Gulf Coast, Midwest and California) and supervises them worldwide (including Canada, Mexico, Japan, South America, Africa and Europe). The clients they have successfully represented include Great American Insurance Company, Lloyds Underwriters, NipponKoa Insurance Company, Ltd., Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance, Sompo Japan Insurance Company, Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Company, Travelers Insurance Company and XL Specialty Insurance Company, among others.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maloof-browne-eagan-llc.jpeg
Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Firearms Legal Protection
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Firearms Legal Protection in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Firearms Legal Protection (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Firearms Legal Protection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/firearms-legal-protection.jpeg
Firearms Legal Protection
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maloof-browne-eagan-llc.jpeg
Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Firearms Legal Protection company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Firearms Legal Protection company.

In the current year, Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company and Firearms Legal Protection company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company nor Firearms Legal Protection company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company nor Firearms Legal Protection company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company nor Firearms Legal Protection company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection company nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection company nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Firearms Legal Protection company employs more people globally than Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Firearms Legal Protection nor Maloof Browne & Eagan LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X