Comparison Overview

Fire and Ice Mechancial

VS

Laser Works

Fire and Ice Mechancial

40642 Mound Road, Sterling Heights, Michigan, 48310, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fireandicemechanical.com

Fire and Ice Mechanical is a full service heating and cooling company for commercial and industrial systems. Fire & Ice has served businesses in Southeast Michigan since 1984, and we pride ourselves on a quality reputation built on years of prompt, cost effective service. Whether it's emergency service, preventive maintenance, system upgrades or strategic planning, our qualified sales and/or service engineers will work with your facility managers to satisfy any and all system requirements. See why businesses large and small depend on Fire & Ice Mechanical for all of their heating and cooling needs. For scheduling, call us at (586) 978-2300 anytime. We are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Laser Works

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tkchriston.be

Subcontracting in LasercuttingLaser Works is reeds meer dan 15 jaar actief als toeleverancier in lasersnijden van buis en plaat. Dankzij vakbekwame mensen en ons hoogtechnologisch machinepark wisten wij een sterke reputatie op te bouwen. Zo kunnen we producten tot 4m lang snijden en numerisch gestuurd plooien. Innovatieve software helpt ons om knooppunten van ronde en rechthoekige buizen, in combinatie met vlakke stukken, kostenbesparend uit te werken. Een ruim assortiment plaatmateriaal en buizen op voorraad, gekoppeld aan een flexibele productie en service maken ons tot uw betrouwbare partner. Tot onze klanten rekenen wij onder andere de automobielsector, machinebouw, design, kunst, lettering, trappenmakers, en andere.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fire-and-ice-mechancial.jpeg
Fire and Ice Mechancial
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-works.jpeg
Laser Works
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fire and Ice Mechancial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laser Works
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fire and Ice Mechancial in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laser Works in 2025.

Incident History — Fire and Ice Mechancial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fire and Ice Mechancial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laser Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laser Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fire-and-ice-mechancial.jpeg
Fire and Ice Mechancial
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-works.jpeg
Laser Works
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Laser Works company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fire and Ice Mechancial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laser Works company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fire and Ice Mechancial company.

In the current year, Laser Works company and Fire and Ice Mechancial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laser Works company nor Fire and Ice Mechancial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laser Works company nor Fire and Ice Mechancial company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laser Works company nor Fire and Ice Mechancial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial company nor Laser Works company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor Laser Works holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial company nor Laser Works company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laser Works company employs more people globally than Fire and Ice Mechancial company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor Laser Works holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor Laser Works holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor Laser Works holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor Laser Works holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor Laser Works holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor Laser Works holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References