Comparison Overview

Fire and Ice Mechancial

VS

GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED

Fire and Ice Mechancial

40642 Mound Road, Sterling Heights, Michigan, 48310, US
Last Update: 2026-03-16
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fireandicemechanical.com

Fire and Ice Mechanical is a full service heating and cooling company for commercial and industrial systems. Fire & Ice has served businesses in Southeast Michigan since 1984, and we pride ourselves on a quality reputation built on years of prompt, cost effective service. Whether it's emergency service, preventive maintenance, system upgrades or strategic planning, our qualified sales and/or service engineers will work with your facility managers to satisfy any and all system requirements. See why businesses large and small depend on Fire & Ice Mechanical for all of their heating and cooling needs. For scheduling, call us at (586) 978-2300 anytime. We are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED

Plumbe Street , Burnley , Lancashire, BB11 3AB, GB
Last Update: 2026-03-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.grcengineering.co.uk/

Established in 1990, we provide sub contract engineering services to a wide range of industries. With constant investment in our people, equipment and facilities, the services we offer are wide ranging and can be split into the following 2 areas of business; Mechanical Site Services  Machinery and plant installations  Machinery and plant refurbishments  Machinery and plant improvements and modifications  Machinery and plant relocations  Contract engineering maintenance  Engineering maintenance shift cover  Pipework system installation  Confined space engineering  Ducting and HVAC system installations  On-site welding and fabrications  Lifting equipment inspection, testing and certificating Manufacturing Engineering Services  3D Design Software – Autodesk Inventor  CNC steel profiling  CNC steel forming  Large quantity of traditional steel working machinery  Highly skilled workforce – sheet metal workers, steel fabricators, coded welders  1 off prototypes / large scale batch work  Small components / 10t assemblies

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fire-and-ice-mechancial.jpeg
Fire and Ice Mechancial
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grc-engineering-limited.jpeg
GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fire and Ice Mechancial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fire and Ice Mechancial in 2026.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED in 2026.

Incident History — Fire and Ice Mechancial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fire and Ice Mechancial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fire-and-ice-mechancial.jpeg
Fire and Ice Mechancial
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grc-engineering-limited.jpeg
GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fire and Ice Mechancial company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fire and Ice Mechancial company.

In the current year, GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company and Fire and Ice Mechancial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company nor Fire and Ice Mechancial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company nor Fire and Ice Mechancial company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company nor Fire and Ice Mechancial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial company nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial company nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED company employs more people globally than Fire and Ice Mechancial company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fire and Ice Mechancial nor GRC ENGINEERING LIMITED holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References